User talk:Nommonomanac

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to userland! I hope you enjoy your floating thingy. :) --mav

-- It's lovely. We spend happy nights in together... -Nommo


Wot free drink??? I never got a free drink!!!! quercus robur

-- Case of being in the right place at the right time... -Nommo


Floating thingy? Please tell me what this is, I'd like to know more... User:Willsmith

-- at the side of the screen... that menu thing... it can be made to stay there when you scroll down a page. It floats! It's great! Like it's on a cussion of air... like that stadium in Japan... - Nommo


It was definitely Roger Meddows-Taylor (Queen) who was involved in Band Aid, please see publicity shot on http://hk.geocities.com/popmusic80/main.htm

The above website seems to have moved the picture, Roger Taylor (Queen) is in the back row between Tony Hadley and Simon Le Bon. http://hk.geocities.com/popmusic80/main.htm Mintguy 08:30 Apr 19, 2003 (UTC)

eeek. You're right, I'm wrong. I even went so far as to download the "Do they know it's Christmas" video using Kazaa, anticipating seeing Rog banging away at the drums, which of course he wasn't. Sorry. It was a poor quality picture and I'd convinced myself that was him, but now I look at it again it looks less like him. Damn.

With regard to The Commercial Album does the tracklisting on the LP carry over to the CD? -- sugarfish 02:11, 13 Aug 2003 (UTC)


I would like you to see the Talk Sega Genesis section on another idea I have. I want to create a separate Article for the Megadrive and put in information applying to the Megadrive in it. Likewise, information regarding the Genesis goes to the Genesis section.

This system is used with Nintendo Entertainment System and Famicom - WhisperToMe


Don't move pages unless you know what you are doing! All London Underground stations have pages Station Name tube station. Ed g2s 16:48, 2 Nov 2003 (UTC)


Lindisfarne - crikey, you're right about Cul de Sac. I have grown up under a misapprehension! Thanks for spotting that. --Nevilley 07:42, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)


Thought I'd bring the Image_talk:Canallock.png page to your attention, since I can't do anything about the problem at the moment (no imaging software), and you're the original artist - you may be able to fix it! --Steinsky 23:50, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)


[edit] Unverified image

Hi! Thanks for uploading the following image:

I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}}:

GFDL

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
Subject to disclaimers.

if you release it under the GNU Free Documentation License, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know at my talk page and I'll tag it for you. Thanks so much. Denni 04:23, 2004 Dec 13 (UTC)

P.S. You can help tag other images at Wikipedia:Untagged_Images. Thanks again.

[edit] Unverified image

Another unverified image: Image:Drogo.jpg. (See instructions in above post). - Mattingly23 16:11, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Defenestration

Your website uses the word "defenestrating". Kudos. -Fennec (はさばくのきつね) 05:03, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

[edit] British county names (again)

A year or so ago you kindly helped out with developing a policy on this. It's all going pear-shaped and I, for one, would be grateful if you'd take another look. I've raised an RfC or you can go straight to the Project's talk page. Thanks. Chris Jefferies 7 July 2005 16:32 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject on Sheffield Wednesday

WikiProject Sheffield Wednesday Hi Nommonomanac. I am inviting you to join the WikiProject on Sheffield Wednesday, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of articles relating to Sheffield Wednesday F.C. You have received this message either because you have previously edited pages related to Sheffield Wednesday or you have stated on Wikipedia that you are a fan of the club. This is a fledgling WikiProject and we would welcome your contributions, please visit the project page for more details. Dan1980 11:42, 5 August 2006 (UTC) WikiProject Sheffield Wednesday