User talk:No Parking

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Contents

[edit] ED

Did you take your "needs more cowbell" boilerplate from Encyclopedia damatica? (Cause I... um... used to write for them and created that template. Wow, small world. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by No Parking (talk • contribs) 20:52, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Nope, sorry. I took it from another user's userspace, though I can't remember whom, to tell you the truth. The image was only {{fairuse}}, and thus, I couldn't use it on my user space, but I love that sketch so much. -Mysekurity 01:19, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] sorry

Sorry, I thought this was the other wiki. I wanted to write something different on this one.

Kinda funny... "The Other Wiki" is what people on ED call wikipedia. I'm No Parking and I approved this message

[edit] Your sig

I want to tell you that I really like your current signature. It made me smile. NatusRoma 02:37, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

...but please use a timestamp! Set your sig in Special:Preferences and then sign with ~~~~. WP:SIG. r3m0t talk 23:24, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Satisfaction

I don't think the FAC requirements were any less demanding around this time last year when it came to references. I think most of the questionable content was added long after the article became featured (it has been a year, after all). Johnleemk | Talk 07:53, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Useless

If the Works Cited page wasn't a good place to put said information, where would be? And for that matter, what should Wikipedia do with the Works Cited page? Provide history?

(I guess that sounds like a good idea too, and kind of interesting to boot...) Werty8472

[edit] Thanks for helping

Dear No Parking: Hi, I wanted to say thanks for helping me with the ill nomination of The NBA on NBC. I have been here for three years, but my main object is writing articles and making friends, so I really don't spend a lot of time nominating or doing "laundry" (if you will) duties. So, as you can see Ive only nominated about three times before, a lot of times, I still need help with things like that.

Anyways, thanks for helping and God bless you!

Sincerely yours, your friend, Antonio WikiHell Martin

[edit] Tumbling Dice

You have my seal of approval!
You have my seal of approval!

First of all, I'm flattered to think of myself as the "Grand Wikipedia Song Article Seal of Approval" guy. Anyway, I've looked over the article, and I'm very impressed. It's thorough, excellently referenced, and completely NPOV, which is always hard for solo articles. So, good work, and I'd be happy to support it on its next FAC. Deltabeignet 05:45, 22 December 2005 (UTC)


[edit] Thank you!!

Thanks for noticing my little plight :) I'm glad someone else understands this template. — 0918BRIAN • 2005-12-23 05:50

[edit] Tumbling Dice

Don't have time for a detailed look right now -- I recommend putting it on WP:PR before sending it to FAC. I note the "Quotes" section, which is usually considered inappropriate for Wikipedia articles (better to link to the relevant Wikiquote page). The Ronstadt quote under "Cover versions" should go also. Tuf-Kat 06:43, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Reverting on User talk:Sean Black

I'm a little bit irritated that you reverted my reversion without so much as an edit summary explaining why [1]. I'm going to revert your addition once more, as I simply cannot see why you would insert a mini, completely irrelevant, userbox on the top of his page. It appears to be vandalism, an appearance that is not helped by the userbox's location at User:No Parking/Threat. Please provide some sort of reason for this addition rather than inserting this object repeatedly with no apparent rationale. Blackcap (talk) 18:11, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Great, that's just fine. In the future, though, please don't revert valid edits with a vandalism removing tool, as it makes it look as though you consider the edit to be vandalism and not worthy of even an explanation. This can be very frustrating, especially if there's a dispute, as there was here. Blackcap (talk) 22:34, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
I did laugh, for what it's worth. Thanks to both of you!--Sean|Black 01:48, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tommy Johnson cleanup

Thanks for the Tommy Johnson cleanup - much needed. --RobHutten 00:39, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem RE: Image:433score.jpg

Warning sign
This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:433score.jpg. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law. We need you to specify two things on the image description page:

  • The copyright holder, and
  • The copyright status

The copyright holder is usually the creator. If the creator was paid to make this image, then their employer may be the copyright holder. If several people collaborated, then there may be more than one copyright holder. If you created this image, then you are the copyright holder.

Because of the large number of images on Wikipedia, we've sorted them using image copyright tags. Just find the right tag corresponding to the copyright status of this image, and paste it onto the image description page like this: {{TAGHERE}}.

There are 3 basic ways to licence an image on Wikipedia:

  • The copyright holder can also release their work into the public domain. See here for examples.
  • Images from certain sources are automatically released into the public domain. This is true for the United States, where the Wikimedia servers are located. (See here for images from the government of the USA and here for other governments.) However, not all governments release their work into the public domain. One exception is the UK (see here for images from the UK government). Non-free licence governments are listed here.
  • Also, in some cases, an image is copyrighted but allowed on Wikipedia because of fair use. To see a) if this image qualifies, and b) if so, how to tag it, see Wikipedia:Fair use.

For more information, see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags. Please remember that untagged images are likely to be deleted.

If you have uploaded other images without including copyright tags, please go back and tag them. Also, please tag all images that you upload in the future.

If you have any questions, just leave a message on my talk page. Thanks again. --Zzyzx11 (Talk) 05:08, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Dancingman.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Dancingman.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. --OrphanBot 05:10, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hover (video game)

Thank you for editing my article and making it look better, because it kinda sucked.

[edit] ED

Did you take your "needs more cowbell" boilerplate from Encyclopedia damatica? (Cause I... um... used to write for them and created that template. Wow, small world. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by No Parking (talk • contribs) 20:52, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Nope, sorry. I took it from another user's userspace, though I can't remember whom, to tell you the truth. The image was only {{fairuse}}, and thus, I couldn't use it on my user space, but I love that sketch so much. -Mysekurity 01:19, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] sorry

Sorry, I thought this was the other wiki. I wanted to write something different on this one.

Kinda funny... "The Other Wiki" is what people on ED call wikipedia. I'm No Parking and I approved this message

[edit] Your sig

I want to tell you that I really like your current signature. It made me smile. NatusRoma 02:37, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

...but please use a timestamp! Set your sig in Special:Preferences and then sign with ~~~~. WP:SIG. r3m0t talk 23:24, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Satisfaction

I don't think the FAC requirements were any less demanding around this time last year when it came to references. I think most of the questionable content was added long after the article became featured (it has been a year, after all). Johnleemk | Talk 07:53, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Useless

If the Works Cited page wasn't a good place to put said information, where would be? And for that matter, what should Wikipedia do with the Works Cited page? Provide history?

(I guess that sounds like a good idea too, and kind of interesting to boot...) Werty8472

[edit] Thanks for helping

Dear No Parking: Hi, I wanted to say thanks for helping me with the ill nomination of The NBA on NBC. I have been here for three years, but my main object is writing articles and making friends, so I really don't spend a lot of time nominating or doing "laundry" (if you will) duties. So, as you can see Ive only nominated about three times before, a lot of times, I still need help with things like that.

Anyways, thanks for helping and God bless you!

Sincerely yours, your friend, Antonio WikiHell Martin

[edit] Tumbling Dice

You have my seal of approval!
You have my seal of approval!

First of all, I'm flattered to think of myself as the "Grand Wikipedia Song Article Seal of Approval" guy. Anyway, I've looked over the article, and I'm very impressed. It's thorough, excellently referenced, and completely NPOV, which is always hard for solo articles. So, good work, and I'd be happy to support it on its next FAC. Deltabeignet 05:45, 22 December 2005 (UTC)


[edit] Thank you!!

Thanks for noticing my little plight :) I'm glad someone else understands this template. — 0918BRIAN • 2005-12-23 05:50

[edit] Tumbling Dice

Don't have time for a detailed look right now -- I recommend putting it on WP:PR before sending it to FAC. I note the "Quotes" section, which is usually considered inappropriate for Wikipedia articles (better to link to the relevant Wikiquote page). The Ronstadt quote under "Cover versions" should go also. Tuf-Kat 06:43, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Reverting on User talk:Sean Black

I'm a little bit irritated that you reverted my reversion without so much as an edit summary explaining why [2]. I'm going to revert your addition once more, as I simply cannot see why you would insert a mini, completely irrelevant, userbox on the top of his page. It appears to be vandalism, an appearance that is not helped by the userbox's location at User:No Parking/Threat. Please provide some sort of reason for this addition rather than inserting this object repeatedly with no apparent rationale. Blackcap (talk) 18:11, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Great, that's just fine. In the future, though, please don't revert valid edits with a vandalism removing tool, as it makes it look as though you consider the edit to be vandalism and not worthy of even an explanation. This can be very frustrating, especially if there's a dispute, as there was here. Blackcap (talk) 22:34, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
I did laugh, for what it's worth. Thanks to both of you!--Sean|Black 01:48, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tommy Johnson cleanup

Thanks for the Tommy Johnson cleanup - much needed. --RobHutten 00:39, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem RE: Image:433score.jpg

Warning sign
This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:433score.jpg. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law. We need you to specify two things on the image description page:

  • The copyright holder, and
  • The copyright status

The copyright holder is usually the creator. If the creator was paid to make this image, then their employer may be the copyright holder. If several people collaborated, then there may be more than one copyright holder. If you created this image, then you are the copyright holder.

Because of the large number of images on Wikipedia, we've sorted them using image copyright tags. Just find the right tag corresponding to the copyright status of this image, and paste it onto the image description page like this: {{TAGHERE}}.

There are 3 basic ways to licence an image on Wikipedia:

  • The copyright holder can also release their work into the public domain. See here for examples.
  • Images from certain sources are automatically released into the public domain. This is true for the United States, where the Wikimedia servers are located. (See here for images from the government of the USA and here for other governments.) However, not all governments release their work into the public domain. One exception is the UK (see here for images from the UK government). Non-free licence governments are listed here.
  • Also, in some cases, an image is copyrighted but allowed on Wikipedia because of fair use. To see a) if this image qualifies, and b) if so, how to tag it, see Wikipedia:Fair use.

For more information, see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags. Please remember that untagged images are likely to be deleted.

If you have uploaded other images without including copyright tags, please go back and tag them. Also, please tag all images that you upload in the future.

If you have any questions, just leave a message on my talk page. Thanks again. --Zzyzx11 (Talk) 05:08, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Dancingman.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Dancingman.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. --OrphanBot 05:10, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hover (video game)

Thank you for editing my article and making it look better, because it kinda sucked.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../n/o/_/User_talk%7ENo_Parking_c209.html"