Template talk:No copyright holder
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Template:No copyright holder has been protected indefinitely. Use {{editprotected}} on this page to request an edit. |
Is this template not redundant to {{subst:nsd}}? Stifle (talk) 22:45, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
- I really like this one. It's clear and concise. It may work as a replacement for {{subst:nsd}}, {{subst:nld}} and {{subst:untagged}}. Carnildo, I suggest saying "Remove this tag only when you provide the information" (or "Only remove this tag when you provide the information") (the emphasis would not be needed on the template). --Abu Badali 22:57, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Source
How do people feel about adding another question, like "Where did you get the image?" Sometimes people list the copyright holder and some very specific license but don't list the source, or their relationship to the copyright holder. - cohesion 06:28, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me. --Carnildo 06:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- Added, I tried to keep the wording simple like the other questions, but someone might have a better idea :) - cohesion 07:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] This automated message is crap.
What am I supposed to add? What qualifies? What ridiculous templates can I add to make it okay? No links to acceptable quantities are given! Teh Pulpo 08:36, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Read what it says:
-
-
- Who created this image?
- Who owns the copyright to this image?
- Where did this image come from?
-
You don't add "rediculous templates" to make it okay, you add the information about; the creator of the image, the copyright holder of the image (usually same as creator) and the source of the image. For example "Image created by Bob Smith, copyright holder, all rights to the image released, from http://example.com/foo.jpg", or something like that. There are templates that can be added to convey this information, but the important thing is that the information is there, not what form it takes. Once the information is supplied the image won't be deleted, at least not automatically – Qxz 09:52, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
