From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.
Request reason: "I'm not a sock, I have made 250 contributions, no vandalism, and no personal attacks at all, unblock this account please, I have created many articles and been a big help on wikipedia, Nishkid64 has went against the assume good faith rule and blocked me for nothing. Wikipedia allows sockpuppets and alternative accounts if they are not abusive. I have been a big help to this project. Look at my contributions, welcoming users, contributing to articles, and warning vandals. I think I deserve another chance."
Decline reason: "Block evasion is considered an abusive use of sockpuppets -- if you've really turned over a new leaf, either apologize and request unblocking from your main account, or just register an entirely unconnected account that will never become associated with any of your past disruptive behavior. Sorry. Luna Santin 00:07, 22 December 2006 (UTC)"
This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
- To the reviewing admin - you may find this diff interesting (confimed as this user by IP). Martinp23 18:25, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
