Talk:Nitrogen triiodide

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Chemistry Portal Nitrogen triiodide is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.
Article Grading: The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article..

why does this explosion occur? Why is the compound so delicate? how is it used? how is it kept safely? Kingturtle 04:18 8 Jun 2003 (UTC)

This site has a good overview on the compound. I believe that it can be kept stable in an aqueous solution or in pure liquid form. It does not have any uses as far as I know besides to demonstrate it explosiveness. -Eszett 16:17 10 Jun 2003 (GMT -5)

The reason for the explosion can be worked out by the same means any chemist would use - determining the energy of the products (N2, NH4I, I2, NH3) relative to the reactants (NI3, or NI3.NH3x). The aqueous solution is not stable; only the ammonate (NI3.NH3x) is stable. If an aqueous solution becomes depleted of ammonia (by formation of a higher ammonate or escape of gaseous nh3 from the soultion), it becomes unstable.

I removed the bit about spreading it on the floor and having people step on it. It's neat, and it's not very dangerous, but I don't think it belongs in an encyclopedia. And it stains feet, and any excess iodine can burn a bit. It just doesn't belong there. Nick 22:47, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Transwiki section?

Does the home-preparation section belong on Wikipedia? I'd say it'd be more at home on Wikibooks. GeeJo _{(t) (c)} • 09:59, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nitrogen triiodide really the same thing as ammonium triiodide?

Previously the article listed the two as synonymous, however aren't they NI₃ and NH₄I₃ respectively? If they are the same, an explanation is in order in the article somewhere. For now I've removed "ammonium triiodide" from the opening paragraph. If someone puts it back can they please an an explanation as to why they are the same? 129.82.48.50 23:08, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Explosive preparation

I deleted the section describing the step-by-step preparation process of the explosive NI3. This kind of information does not belong here. JEFCG 30 June 2006.

Why doesn't it? Where exactly does one end the stifling of free exchange of information? --Mfree 19:08, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Agreed, and restored. I suspect an ulterior motive here. ~ Eidako 16:58, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

I have removed it again .. Wikipedia is not a manual, per WP:NOT --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 17:06, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

There's far worse violations of this to be found on Wikipedia (drowning, shallow water blackout, sailing, virtually any video game article), but okay. Would either of these be acceptable (in order of preference)?

1. Rewrite the section to provide a general outline of how it may be prepared, but in a neutral, non-instructive format, in the vein of the "NI3·NH3 explosions leave orange-to-purple iodine stains that are difficult to wash. However, they can be easily removed by sodium thiosulfate solution" comment currently in the article.

2. Provide a link to an offsite set of instructions.

~ Eidako 16:53, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

That there are other articles violating WP:NOT is not the question here, and maybe someone should look at the things on these pages as well. But now for consensus.

WP:NOT gives a commonplace for instructions (err .. wasn't it wikibooks?), so that is anyway a good solution (and one can provide a link to there from here, there is a template for that). I think there is not much wrong with a non-instructive outline (I guess it fits into one sentence, or one must choose to tell more about the mechanism of its formation. So both are good suggestions, I think that is the way to go. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 17:04, 1 September 2006 (UTC)