User talk:NimNick

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Welcome

Hello, NimNick, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! DickClarkMises 15:09, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Please read WP:3RR and use caution in your editing. You have reverted the List of scientists opposing global warming consensus page a number of times this evening. Vsmith 01:56, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Warnings warning

Please do not add bogus warning messages to peoples pages. You are, undoubtedly, frustrated by your failure to persuade a majority to your views. But this action won't help you William M. Connolley 20:45, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Majority? Wikipedia is no democracy. You should read the help pages. --NimNick 20:55, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Indeed, wiki is not a democracy. But my statement stands; you haven't persuaded anyone William M. Connolley 21:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

There was no need to persuade Arcer or Childholds End. LOL --NimNick 21:44, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bogus warning messages

Hi Nick!

Please stop putting bogus warnings ([1], [2]) onto peoples talk pages if they revert your inapproriate edit to List of scientists opposing global warming consensus. Such a change would not even constitute vandalism if your edits were justifiable. As your edits are unsourced nonsense, it might be argued that your repeated edits constitute vandalism, of course. --Stephan Schulz 20:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC)