Talk:Nikki Tyler

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]
This article is within the scope of WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class.

Regarding copyright violation, I admit that I did base my information off the Toyboxx site. However, I tried to rephrase as much as I could since the information was very generic. In fact, every single biography site on Nikki Tyler presents the same information. Therefore, it is rather difficult to elucidate about her life without using some of the material. Nevertheless, I will try to use my own wordings and edit it. Thanks. Lowang 11:16, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I rewrote it to make it sound more independent. If even this cannot fit the Wiki standards, then I don't know what to say. Factual parallels are unavoidable for people with trivial amount of biographical data. Lowang 11:32, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)

If there is only a trivial amount of data concerning her, perhaps whether the article is even necessary should be rethought. - Vague | Rant 11:52, Dec 25, 2004 (UTC)

Well, no doubt she is popular. It's just that we don't know much about her other than the list of movies she appeared in. I'll see what I can dig up. Lowang 22:54, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Talk merged from Talk:Nikki Tyler/Temp

I removed the image. Way too explicit for Wikipedia. ( -- User:Jakes18)

Image in question is Image:Bio.nikki.jpg. Note: boobage. I take no position on the question of if such boobage is "way too explicit", but I am listing image on Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. -- Infrogmation 23:25, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)

probably removed by a puritan american