User talk:Nightmare X

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Spider

I'm sorry for not notifying you about the action I took. I created a redirect to the list as to avoid redundancy. Spider does not meet the guidelines necessary to warrent his own individual article according to our WP:FICT policy, and after a brief read over your "new" article, its been verified all you merely did was copy and paste the summary from the main list page. You also uploaded a new image instead of using the old one already in the list article. There is already a ever-growing concensus by the video gaming community to delete non-notable articles such as this, and in the circumstances established, I thought it best to make the redirect. -ZeroTalk 20:41, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Whereas I know that the article as of now is merely a copy paste of material, I plan on expending on it later by adding such things as a personality description etc. and personally, I think that Spider and Redips were both pivotal plot elements in MMX: Command Mission, in fact, Spider is the only new character in the game to get as much of spotlight as X and Zero, making him perhaps as notable as characters like Colonel who where in just one game. Nightmare X 20:51, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
Okay. Until you construct a complete rewrite and expansion, would it be possible to leave it in list format..? It also might be more plausible to merge him into the Colonel Redips article, as the List summary sums up his invlovement in the story in a nutshell. -ZeroTalk 20:54, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Then so shall it be, until I've finished up with my rewrite the article will remain a redirect to the character list, although the idea of merging with the Redips article (which I started myself long ago) isn't that bad. Nightmare X 20:58, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
Lovely. My apologies about the welcome; I was not aware you had previously recieved one. -ZeroTalk 21:02, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

I just accidentally reverted you: I saw a paragraph deleted, with no indication of a reason. Only when I checked the article history, I saw you had been working on the article. My apologies! However, to make life easier for the people who try to clean up vandalism, could you please consider using edit summaries? Thanks! --JoanneB 09:02, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Balsac SOTU.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Balsac SOTU.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Beefcake_0_0.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Beefcake_0_0.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:16, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:4chan.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:4chan.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. KWH 04:27, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Inflammatory user page

If you continue to add inflammatory messages to your user page, you will be blocked from editing. —Centrxtalk • 01:53, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reminder

As a courtesy for other editors, it is a Wikipedia guideline to sign your talk page and user talk page posts. To do so simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments and your user name or IP address and the date will be automatically added along with a timestamp. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion).For further info see the talk page guidelines. Thank you.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:37, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

NO U! —Nightmare X 18:44, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Serious business redirect

You created a redirect from serious business to internet. You probably don't know, but this has been discussed a number of times, most recently at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2006 October 17, with the conclusion that such a redirect does not belong on Wikipedia. Therefore, I deleted the redirect. Cheers, Jitse Niesen (talk) 23:18, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Moot of 4Chan fame

Please read talk:Moot#Moot of 4Chan fame and provide a reason to retain the inclusion of Moot of 4Chan fame in the Moot disambuation article. --Concrete Cowboy 13:24, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] On my internets?

We were destined to meet again on the fields of /b/attle. Rougewisp 04:31, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

it's moar likely than you think Nightmare X 08:45, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Beyond hell 2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Beyond hell 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:55, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Jizmak.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Jizmak.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 09:41, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gwar

Hi, I left a note in the WP Gwar. We should come to a decision on how WP Films is to treat (or not treat) the articles of your project. Should we use Film infoboxes, or will you use your Gwar infobox for all? IMDb has entries of these video films, so most film categories apply, but do we assess them as films? I would appreciate if you help me sort it out. Hoverfish Talk 19:15, 2 March 2007 (UTC)