Talk:NicVAX

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

NicVAX was a good article candidate, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. Once the objections listed below are addressed, the article can be renominated. You may also seek a review of the decision if you feel there was a mistake. Date of review: 20 December 2006

An entry from NicVAX appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 20 September 2006.

[edit] Failed GA

As of [1], the article during this review, I failed this article for Good Article status. The major reason is that the article is still a stub article; thus it is not yet ready for GA. The scope of the subject is not broad enough. For instances, how is the clinical development of the drug? How the drug works? Please also expand more about its side effects. The article only shows the studies of the drug during some experimental trials, what is the current status? Is it already approved to be used clinically? How effective is the drug? .... and many many more. So, when the article is ready, you can renominate it again. As always, if you feel disagree about this review, you may ask for another re-review. — Indon (reply) — 16:01, 20 December 2006 (UTC)