User talk:Neutrality

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Talk Page Policy (stolen from Snowspinner and The Epopt)
I archive when I feel like it. Depending on my whim, your comments may or may not be archived. The odds of not being archived are inversely proportional to the amount you annoy me. Please do not annoy me.

Please do not post any requests for help in fighting other Wikipedians here. I'm on the Arbitration Committee, so I'm not going to get involved in liberating you from oppression directly—if I did, I'd have to recuse myself when your case was addressed by the committee. Post your tales of woe somewhere else. On the other hand, if someone does post a request here, please leave it alone. This is my talk page; I'll clean it up if I want it cleaned up. Fight your edit wars on another battlefield.

Requests for help in research, article-writing, peer reviewing, FAC comments, and editing are always welcome, of course. If I don't respond to you right away, I'm not ignoring you; I'm just doing something else or didn't see your comment on the page. Thank you! --Ben

Archives
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29
Picture of the day
Mexican Wolf

Mexican Wolf
Photo credit: Jim Clark, USFWS
Archive - More featured pictures...

Contents

[edit] Hey!

um, I was in the middle of trying to fix up Lifeboat Ethics, and I know that it was pretty incoherent/random facts, but I wasn't done... Could yu put it back so I can finish it?

Thanks, CchristianTehWazzit

(nevermind, finally figured it out myself)

[edit] TS edit

Curious about why you introduced a typo at Sociological and cultural aspects of Tourette syndrome ??? I'm thinking you may have intended something else. Sandy (Talk) 13:55, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. Sandy (Talk) 13:59, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Stuyvesant High School

Thanks for all the work you did on the Stuyvesant High School article. It became a Featured Article earlier this year, and today it is on the main page. RossPatterson 04:19, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] November Esperanza Newsletter

Program Feature: Admin Coaching (needs coaches!)
Admin Coaching needs coaches!!! If you are an administrator, or even a generally experienced user, do consider signing up to be a coach.

Admin Coaching, now being coordinated by HighwayCello, is a program for people who want help learning some of the more subtle aspects of Wikipedia policy and culture. People are matched with experienced users who are willing to offer coaching. The program is designed for people who have figured out the basics of editing articles; they're not newcomers any more, but they might want some help in learning new roles. In this way, Esperanza would help keep hope alive for Wikipedia because we would always be grooming the next generation of admins.
What's New?
The Tutorial Drive is a new Esperanza program! In an effort to make complicated processes on Wikipedia easier for everyone, Esperanza working to create and compile a list of tutorials about processes here on Wikipedia. Consider writing one!
A discussion on how Esperanza relates to the encyclopedia has been started; please add your thoughts.
Many thanks to MiszaBot, courtesy of Misza13, for delivering the newsletter.
The last AC meeting (full log)
  • The list of proposed programs has been updated, with some proposals being archived.
  • There is now a new program: the Tutorial Drive! Consider writing a tutorial on something you are good at doing on Wikipedia.
  • The suggestion of adding a cohesive look to all the Esperanza pages is being considered; join the discussion if you are interested!
  • In order to make a useful interlanguage welcome template, those involved in translation projects will be asked what English Wikipedia policies are most important and confusing to editors coming from other language Wikipedias.
  • A discussion of Esperanza's role in Wikipedia is being held, with all thoughts of all Esperanzians wanted!
  • Shreshth91 informed everyone that he will be leaving the Esperanza council as life is rather busy; his spot will be filled by the runner up from the last election, HighwayCello.
Signed...
Natalya, Banes, Celestianpower, EWS23, FireFox, The Halo, Shreshth91 and HighwayCello
20:33, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Although having the newsletter appear on everyone's userpage is desired, this may not be ideal for everyone. If, in the future, you wish to receive a link to the newsletter, rather than the newsletter itself, you may add yourself to Wikipedia:Esperanza/Newsletter/Opt Out List.

[edit] T:ITN

Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:In the news section on the Main Page#Notes for administrators, especially when working with images. Putting an unprotected image up, such as here, is an open invitation for goatse on the Main Page. - BanyanTree 19:56, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Additionally, ITN is not a breaking news ticker. Its purpose is to direct readers to articles that have been written or substantially updated to reflect a news story. At the time of the edit cited above, the Rumsfeld article contained one non-proofread sentence on the subject of his actual resignation: "On November 8th, 2006, Rumsfeld resigned from his postition [sic] as Defense Secretary." This conveyed absolutely no information not included in the ITN blurb itself. Please see Template talk:In the news#Rumsfeld update. —David Levy 15:34, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lawrence v. Texas

Lawrence v. Texas is up for a featured article review. Detailed concerns may be found here. Please leave your comments and help us address and maintain this article's featured quality. Sandy (Talk) 18:59, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Map of Italy in 1000 CE/AD is complete

Neutrality: I have completed your map request from February 2005 for a recreation of a map of Italy in 1000 AD/CE. It can be found here. Sincerely yours, MapMaster 15:08, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Debate about (US) vs. (U.S.) vs. (United States) as disambiguators re-opening

Given you expressed an opinion about this last year at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (acronyms), I thought you would appreciate being notified that the debate has re-opened at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (abbreviations). Feel free to comment, if you wish. Thanks! hike395 07:39, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion of Fur Affinity

Hi, I noticed you deleted the article Fur Affinity recently, which I started. I realise that there was not a good deal there at the time, but I fully intended to expand the article soon (I have a rather vested interest in not letting it get to orphaned status). As well, I know you must be busy, but I would appreciate a message when you delete something of mine. Thanks! Blast {{subst:#time:d}}.{{subst:#time:m}}.{{subst:#time:y}} {{subst:#time:H}}{{subst:#time:i}} (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:French Formal Garden in Loire Valley.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:French Formal Garden in Loire Valley.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz Saalfeld (Talk) 12:02, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue IX - November 2006

The November 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] National Mall map

Neutrality, I was scouting the National Mall article for an eventual map and I honestly thought that the photo-map there was quite good. I can work on something, as you suggested, similar to my map of Central Park -- drawn maps like that no doubt present a certain clarity not seen in photo-maps. But it would be hard to improve much upon what is there. Wouldn't one of your replacement maps be a better goal???

Let me know your thoughts, MapMaster 00:04, 1 December 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Gene Robinson.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gene Robinson.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 16:19, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] More replaceable fair use images

—Chowbok ☠ 23:53, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

I thought it might please you to know that UCLA has released Image:Eugene Volokh.jpg (which you uploaded) into the public domain. - crz crztalk 21:26, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Why did you removed Peter Deutsch's photo?

Is there a particular reason?

[edit] Philanthropist

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Philanthropist, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Philanthropist. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. — Sebastian (talk) 03:40, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for the copyedits

Thanks for your edits to White Deer Hole Creek. Do you know what is the preferred style: to have wikilinks that are in both the infobox and text (duplicates), or just links in the box, or just in the article text? Yours, Ruhrfisch 20:06, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks!


Thanks again for your contributions - White Deer Hole Creek made featured article!
Take care, Ruhrfisch 17:11, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Germano Mosconi

I translate Germano Mosconi for English Wikipedia, please make some copy editing to it. Bye --Gildos 21:55, 6 dic 2006 (CET)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue X - December 2006

The December 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:09, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Formosan_Black_Bear.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Formosan_Black_Bear.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:29, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:James_B._Castle_high_School_seal.png

Thanks for uploading Image:James_B._Castle_high_School_seal.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:24, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Geography Cup

You mentioned some conjecture as to the fairness of the Geography Cup competition. However, you did not cite any sources. Is this conjecture verifiable or is this just your personal opinion? Grhs126student 05:58, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Formosan_Blue_Magpie.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Formosan_Blue_Magpie.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:15, 2 January 2007 (UTC)


[edit] A request for assistance

Would you support the concept of moving the Earhart "myths" to a separate page or article? The reason for my suggesting this is that the main article should be an accurate and scholarly work while the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of Amelia Earhart are interesting, they belong in a unique section. Most researchers, as you know, discount the many theories and speculation that has arisen in the years following her last flight. Go onto the Earhart discussion page and register your vote/comments...and a Happy New Year to you as well. Bzuk 03:02 3 January 2007 (UTC).


[edit] Image:Anne Picking.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Anne Picking.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 23:46, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please provide an edit summary

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. Jonathunder 15:27, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] VT Flag/WikiProject Vermont

Something's screwy with the Userboxes that contain the VT flag. I've poked around and can't find anything related to the "peer review" tag that was added to the flad image in the "WikiProject Vermont" UB. Thoughts? Thanks--Jonashart 17:30, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Source and tagging on b:Image:Map of Brazil.png

Hello. I noticed that you uploaded b:Image:Map of Brazil.png at Wikibooks. Though it was in 2004, could you recall the source where you got it from and the license it was under? Please feel free either to post here, update the image description page, or ignore me all together. (Hopefully not the latter. :-D) Any way, there is an appropriate public domain image on Wikimedia Commons...it just looks ugly. Thank you, Iamunknown 07:23, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Zoe7

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Zoe7, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Matt 08:17, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Baseball

Baseball has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. I can't figure out who the main contributers were to this article, but I saw you had made many edits to it, so I am notifying you. I have also left a message at the Project Baseball page. Jeffpw 21:13, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XI - January 2007

The January 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 21:11, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Rob_Andrews.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Rob_Andrews.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:43, 28 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 10:43, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Commonyellowthroat159.jpg

I noticed you uploaded the last version of this image. In case you noticed my unfortunate double-revert, and lest you think I was actually trying to modify it, I clicked on the "revert" link by mistake, so I then reverted it to your good version. I had intended to view the earlier revision, not revert to it, and I'm actually shocked that there was no warning or confirmation dialog to protect against unintentional clicks like mine... Is there any way to delete my "versions" of the file and clean up the edit history? --Fru1tbat 20:11, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WP:MILHIST Coordinator Elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 11!

Delivered by grafikbot 11:19, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Focus on the Family to-do

I deleted your addition to the to-do list and wanted to notify you. I laid-out my reasons on the talk page. Have a nice day. Rkevins 18:56, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Osceola2.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Osceola2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Donald Albury 01:19, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Military History elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by February 25!

Delivered by grafikbot 14:35, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Centers_for_Medicare_and_Medicaid_Services_logo.GIF

Thanks for uploading Image:Centers_for_Medicare_and_Medicaid_Services_logo.GIF. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:04, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:American flag.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:American flag.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Remember the dot (t) 06:09, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:National_Science_Foundation_logo.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:National_Science_Foundation_logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Iamunknown 07:02, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

I've reinstated {{ifd}}. It's still listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 February 21#Image:National Science Foundation logo.png. --Iamunknown 05:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Suicide Silence deletion....

So... was there any reasoning behind the deletion of the Suicide Silence article? --ARandomHeretic 04:15, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

I'll assume there wasn't. I'll be re-opening the article. If you have any objections, please, feel free to have reasoning behind the deletion of the article before deleting it. --ARandomHeretic 02:42, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Neutrality_campaign.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Neutrality_campaign.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:50, 24 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 14:50, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XII - February 2007

The February 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 16:03, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] {{United States Senate}}

Please see my discussion at Template_talk:United States Senate.—Markles 22:33, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Graner

Thanks for uploading Image:Graner. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:10, 4 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jkelly 09:10, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Essjay/Letter

I notice you just re-deleted User:Essjay/Letter. Per the concerns I've noted on User talk:Cbrown1023#Deletion of User:Essjay/Letter and WP:AN#User:Essjay/Letter, would you be opposed to the page being recreated with a (protected) notice explaining that it has been deleted per Essjay's request on his talk page? I think that would be a sensible solution, but I'd rather not do so without your approval, lest it be construed as wheel warring. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 17:40, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Never mind, it's been recreated already. I've edited the page slightly to make the notice look more formal. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 17:52, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Template:PD-Nelson

I see this is unused. Would you object to me nominating it at WP:TFD? --Iamunknown 22:35, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Trinity Christian High School

I thought I would let you know that this article is up for deletion again and you can vote on it at the following page: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trinity Christian High School (2nd nomination)

--MJHankel 01:10, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Could you have a look at these articles?

Could you have a look at these articles and their talk?

I feel the articles are extremely well sourced and balanced. I'd like somebody else to remove the tags. Please look at my last versions, because I have run up against somebody from the evolution/creation universe who wants to troll around for lehakholis (Aramaic word, you might be able to guess what it means). --Metzenberg 03:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Help Resolving a conflict

I have read the pages about this on wikipedia and I have came to you because you seem to be a person who knows how wikipedia is supposed to work and are most likely 100% neutral on this matter. I am involved in a rather intense edit war with two other editors of the article Miriam Rivera. In the last days the user User:Jokestress has quite reasonably asked for the article to be backed up with more reliable sources. Well I found them and that seems to have placated her. She has acted in 100% reasonable way in all of this. The problem arises in that she has asked in the spirt of resolving the conflict we were having other people who are not 100% neutral it seems to comment on the matter. These being the user User:Longhair and the userUser:Alison in particular who have not bothered to justify anything that they have done. Longhiar being an admin seems to feel no need to discuss anything and I feel is abusing her powers. Is there anything you can do? --Hfarmer 04:12, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIII - March 2007

The March 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 19:47, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../n/e/u/User_talk%7ENeutrality_6997.html"