Talk:Neutral monism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Philosophy WikiProject, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy and the history of ideas. Please read the instructions and standards for writing and maintaining philosophy articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
Should the opening sentence say that physical and mental events are to be reduced... (as it does now) or that they can be reduced.... Saying that they are to be reduced sounds apocalyptic. Wesley
- And what's with using the word "stuff" --Tothebarricades.tk 21:00, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)
I removed the mention of reduction, because AFAIK, neutral monism need not be reductionist. Added William James (from Oxford Dict. of Phil., 1996). Jussi Hirvi 18 July 2005
