Neurological levels

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

One of a series of articles on
Neuro-linguistic programming
(NLP)

Main articles
NLP · Principles · Topics · History
NLP and science · Therapy · Bibliography


Concepts and methods
Modeling · Meta model · Milton model
Perceptual positions · Rapport · Reframing
Representation systems · Submodalities
Positive intention · Meta program · Neurological levels
Anchoring · Well-formed outcome


People
Richard Bandler · John Grinder
Robert Dilts · Stephen Gilligan
Judith DeLozier · David Gordon
Connirae Andreas · Steve Andreas
Frank Pucelik · Paul McKenna
Ross Jeffries · Tony Robbins
Genie Laborde · Charles Faulkner


Principal influences
Fritz Perls · Gestalt therapy
Milton Erickson · Hypnotherapy
Virginia Satir · Family therapy
Transformational linguistics
Gregory Bateson · Paul Watzlawick
Epistemology · Double Bind
Alfred Korzybski · Map-territory
Frank Farrelly · Provocative therapy


This box: view  talk  edit

The Neurological levels were proposed by anthropologist Gregory Bateson (1972, 1979). He defined a hierarchy of abstraction including beliefs, values and identity. He perceived relationships as having a higher abstraction than identity, and therefore influencing lower levels in the hierarchy, such as beliefs and behavior.

Contents

[edit] Dilts' (neuro)logical levels

In Neuro-linguistic programming, they were developed by Robert Dilts into the Dilts' Neuro-logical levels (also known as the logical levels of change and the logical levels of thinking) which are useful for assisting with or understanding change from an individual, social or organization point of view. Each level is progressively more psychologically encompassing and impactful.

A belief, outcome may be considered from different levels:

[edit] Logical levels/logical types

The model as developed by Dilts has come under criticism from NLP co-creator John Grinder for its logical incoherence: see Grinder and Bostic's 'Whispering in the Wind'. NLP trainer Michael Breen is another prominent critic, claiming that the utility of the model is not in its structure, but can be explained adequately as an example of anchoring.[citation needed]

[edit] See also

[edit] External links

In other languages