User talk:Neckro
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I've been neglecting my talk page for awhile, so let's rearrange it and be sure to include everything that everybody's complained or raved about:
Contents |
[edit] Harsh Criticism
[edit] Edit on Chinese Civil War
Please take a look at Chinese family name. It's inpolite and unconventional to refer to people by their given names in a formal context. --Jiang 03:07, 8 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- This was back when I was a wily new Wikipedia user who didn't really know any better. I apparently stepped on some toes. Apologies! neckro
[edit] Jurassic Park
Hey, It's Wolfj. Did you delete an article section on "Jurassic Park?" Why? That was a very interesting tidbit of info. No one knew that, and know people do! Until you deleted it! -Wolfj (11 Dec)
- Yes, I did delete it. It was an IP-user edit with no summary, it was completely out of place on the page, and it didn't really say anything that wasn't already present in the article, so I removed it. neckro 19:33, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Neutrality/Praise
(newcomer blurb from Angela removed)
[edit] Puppy Album Write-ups
It was high time someone did them, and it looks like you've done a great job. Kudos and much thanks. :) -Hn 06:23, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Image question
You uploaded a picture on commons of DNA labels, which is based on my DNA labels image. In the image box, you said it had been reconstructed, but besides different resolutions, I cannot tell how they are different. Did you change anything else? →Raul654 18:53, Mar 6, 2005 (UTC)
- Nothing was changed; it was just redone for higher resolution and so it could be saved in a lossless format (PNG). neckro 07:27, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[edit] afd Cleanse Fold and Manipulate
I nominated Cleanse Fold and Manipulate for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cleanse Fold and Manipulate. Since you created it, I'm sure you'll wish to say why it should be kept, and vote to keep it. My reasons for the nomination are there. --rob 08:45, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:DNA-labels.png
In the cytosine/guanine pairing, you show the two O atoms bonding as well as the two NH2 groups bonding. Other references both in the main DNA article and elsewhere on the Web show the bonding as the O and NH2 groups cross bonding - ie one of the bases needs to be reflected to give the correct pairing. --PeterJeremy 12:59, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- PS - I fixed this in August 2006, and recently recently replaced that with an svg image. I replaced all instances of it ... It's still on wikimedia commons, though. There's a note on it that mentions the problem. -Madeleine 19:35, 28 March 2007 (UTC)