Talk:Nawal Al Zoghbi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] nawal is hot!
indeed! 24.199.50.162 02:14, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
She used to be hot. Now she looks scary with all that plastic surgery. 75.62.132.173 14:21, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] COPYING spice girls -holler- video
Neither a word about her COPYING spice girls -holler- video?
- Yeah hopefully I will enlist it. The whole article requires revision anyway. Omernos 00:24, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Clean Up
the article is SO messy, I think it requires cleaning up! Some of the vital information are actually enlisted under "Trivia". I don't know why, but with that the article looks pretty 'Fan-Page' material. -- Omernos 20:32, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- The article's looking pretty good now, but there's a lot I have no information on at all (I'm just an Aussie, what would I know about Arabic music? :P), so feel free to leap in and add stuff about the copying of the video that was mentioned above. As a general rule, if a page neads cleanup, nobody's going to object if you have a good go at cleaning it up yourself. BigHaz 10:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- I did 3 albums so far, I'll work on the rest later Omernos 11:57, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] page move
Just thought I'd mention that I've moved the page to Al-Zoghbi (with a dash) to reflect the spelling used on her website and album covers. f(x)=ax2+bx+c 20:17, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] negative aspects of the article
i feel that there is alot of information in this article that is reflecting nawal in a negative light, i.e. the spice girl video, the 'coppying' of mandam alaik and the 'failure' of the ablum 'maloum'. i am considering removing them, or editing them. please discuss - Rekuskid
- Negative or positive, we're only interested in verifiable facts. If her video is indeed very similar to another one, or someone prominent states that the video looks like it was copied, then we can include it. Though the sections could probably be worded better (they've actually been removed...) I don't think they're biased. ~MDD4696 22:46, 1 April 2007 (UTC)