User talk:Naveenbm
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
1 |
[edit] Jainism in Karnataka, Chandragiri/Vindyagiri
Neveen, Looks like you have done a fine job here. I have a splendid book on this topic (Making of South Karnataka, Dr. Malini Adiga) and sometime in 2007 (not sure when) I intend to fall headlong into this topic, after a trip to Shravanabelagola. We should work together at that time and nicely tie up Jainism in KA/Shravanabelagola/Kambadahalli/Western Ganga Dynasty and work towards a featured article. Untill then, keep up the good work. Good luck.Dineshkannambadi 14:52, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Jainism in KA
This is how we need to structure the page (I think this will under go change-open to ideas) This is a big topic and may take a long time to develop.
- Jainism in Karnataka
- Early History (300BC to 500AD)
- Medeival History (500AD-1000AD)
- Mention of Kingdoms and how they encouraged with main article link Western Ganga Dynasty
- Late medeival History(1000-1500AD)
- Decline (in Hoysala/Vijayanagar time)
- Modern Histroy(1500-date)
- Pilgrim places
- Shravanabelagola (with main article link)
- Kambadahalli (with main article link)
- Others
- Jain festivals
- Mahamasthakabisheka
- Jain architecture briefs
- Jain Literature (Kannada/Prakrit).Dineshkannambadi 16:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- Did you see the note Sameer Khan (an expert on languages, here in USA I think) left on the Hoysala talk page about the pronounciation of "Hoysala". I was a bit confused about what he wrote. Was this what prompted you to make the change on Hoysala page? I cant see the script on my laptop at work. I will go home later and see if it looks ok.Thanks.Dineshkannambadi 17:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Location of Belur/Halebidu
While the location of these two towns on the map in their respective pages is fairly correct,there seems to be a jumble of latitude/longitude numbers on top of the map. Do you know how to clean this up.thanks.Dineshkannambadi 19:03, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- Took care of it.thanks.Dineshkannambadi 19:08, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 3RR
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. - Aksi_great (talk) 13:52, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hoysala Empire
Naveen, Hoysala empire has become a featured article. Thank you for your many contributions.Dineshkannambadi 17:18, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hoysala Empire
Thanks for your message.Dineshkannambadi 03:20, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] thanks
Thanks for the barn star and a happy new year.Dineshkannambadi 00:57, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Tipu or Tippu
Thanks for your comment. I have left my last message on this subject on the Tipu Sultan talk page. Mick gold 09:38, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
"Dinesh is a seasoned editor and has been working really hard in getting articles to FA standard"
- Ur seasoned editor is so indecent to remove the cited info. Plz make him understand that it is wrong and it accounts to vandalism. Vishu123 10:41, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Jaya Bharata Jananiya Tanujate, was selected for DYK!
Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 00:02, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. When you create new articles on India, do take a couple of seconds to add it to WP:INBIN (the "its new" India pages).Bakaman 23:10, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] kannada help needed
Do you know if this has any info for Hotte Paksha Rangaswamy ? [1].Bakaman 00:04, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] DYK!
Thank you for your contributions! Nishkid64 17:20, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- hello, i know ur a friend of Mr.Kannambadi who's reverting on his behalf. May be his sockpuppet.. i request u to avoid removing cited info. I think u must see 'what r u removing' before u do the honors. If u have any problem,plz see senior wikipedians and i am ready to justify mine edits. Thank you. Sarvabhaum
- The so-called confirmed sockpuppets theory is obselete and conspired. If anyone wants I can prove that i have not done anything against wikipedia rules.
- If u have any problems with citations,do see a senior wikipedian. Either u dont understand the text or as evident,ur a sockpuppet (it doesnt take much to accuse like u and ur friend has been doing it) of u know whom.
Sarvabhaum 01:59, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
I guess I updated correct info on Bangalore. Why was it deleted?
[edit] An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Rudrapatna, was selected for DYK!
Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 00:42, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] rudrapatna
please see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_January_28#Category:People_from_Rudrapatna.Bakaman 20:30, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Pune edits
Either remove links at all (No internal links either, cos there aren't wiki pages for same) of keep external links. As these pages are created we can convert external links to internals.
Keeping dangling internal links wont help the article to improve.
spacejuncky 13:31, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- As most of the links are links to commercial sites, It is a violation of Wikipedia's linking policy (WP:EL). If there are no wikipedia articles links, then rather not have links to such articles. Moreover, the external links are irrelevant to the article.
I agree to what you say but than why are you keeping those links dangling. I am removing their internal links completely. spacejuncky 04:58, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Vachanas
Please see if you have time to write a good page on this topic. Its worth a DYK. The current article that goes by two names Vachanas and Vachana do no justice to this important topic. Eventually, we need to have topics like Kavirajamarga, Vachana, Dasa sahitya, Ragala, Sangatya, Tripadi, Shatpadi, Champu etc all lined up in Kannada literature article.thanks.Dineshkannambadi 15:06, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] navya
Are you familiar with navya literature?Bakaman 17:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
I created a new page on Gopalakrishna Adiga and am wondering if this would help [2].Bakaman 18:05, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re:Gokak Agitation
Hi Naveenbm, Thanks for adding significant and informative content to the article. I appreciate your efforts. Gnanapiti 20:28, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- I added a couple of citations to Vachana page with references.Dineshkannambadi 04:49, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for February 26th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
|
||
Volume 3, Issue 9 | 26 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
|
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:27, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Thanks. This is a new type of topic and this success will greatly help in future architecture related articles w.r.t other empires.thanks for your contributions.Dineshkannambadi 21:23, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
-
-
[edit] Signpost updated for March 5th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
|
||
Volume 3, Issue 10 | 5 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
|
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:31, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for March 12th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
|
||
Volume 3, Issue 11 | 12 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
|
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:35, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re:Greater Bangalore
Hi Naveen,
Good job on expanding this article! As of now, I can think of hooks such as the very definition of Greater Bangalore, and the inclusion on 969 sq km. However, DYK suggestion criteria clearly tells that, article needs to have atleast 1500 characters (displayed, not edited), excluding infoboxes, statistics, references and external links. So I think, the article is somewhat in borderline. Any expansion further would help. Please keep expanding it bit more, and I will try and see a much better hook (if any) and nominate. Thank you! - KNM Talk 07:17, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Popular legend
I am not interested in popular legend but rather in temple history and temple architecture. (See Hoysala architecture for which we just got FA status.) Also, in our temple architecture articles we keep Trivia sections out. We follow strictly WP:ATT. The whole direction and tenure of the article I started was completely changed just after I started it. Someone just snatched it up without even consulting me and made it into a totally different article. I have never had that happen before, a people are usually very considerate. I would prefer to take the part I was doing out and let others write the article as a popular culture article. Sincerely, Mattisse 19:49, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for March 20th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
|
||
Volume 3, Issue 12 | 20 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
WikiWorld comic: "Wilhelm Scream" | News and notes: Bad sin, milestones |
Features and admins | Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News |
The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
|
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:20, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Ti Nam Sri
I started a page on him. Would you know if this link in Kannada has any information on him?Bakaman 16:09, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for March 26th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
|
||
Volume 3, Issue 13 | 26 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
|
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:11, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for April 2nd, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
|
||
Volume 3, Issue 14 | 2 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
|
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:08, 4 April 2007 (UTC)