Talk:Nasr Abu Zayd
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The tone of this article seems hostile to islam. The last paragraph is an example. Also, the underestimation of the Egyptian courts and legal system.
[edit] Critic of Islam
Is he a critic of Islam or not ? If not then he should not be on this list List of Critics of Islam.--Amenra 03:24, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
- He is a critic of Islamism and of sclerotic theology. I think it is very much an oversimplification to call him a critic of Islam. He is not, as far as I can recall from the one lecture of his I attended, a critic of Islam as such. I have only seen that list for the first time today thanks to your remarks, and I would have some concerns about it as well. Palmiro | Talk 03:32, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Murtad?
If he was judged to be a murtad, then he was judged to be an apostate. A heretic is known as a zindiq (heresy=zandaqa). Apostacy and heresy are different concepts. I think the text should be amended to read 'apostate' instead of 'heretic.'لقمانLuqman 00:31, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
According to the text, he is a murtad! For instance because he rejected the Quranic statement that men are superior to women [النساء : 4/33]. Or maybe the author of that passage who is claiming false information about the believe of the modern ulamâ, by writing in the "Humanistic Hermeneutics of the Islam":
The classical position of the modern ulamâ about that issue is understandable as "they still believe in superiority of the male in the family".