User talk:Naruttebayo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Otaku's Dream Mix

  • Are there secondary sources for this article? (eg. reliable articles written by people not affiliated with the project?) You should not create new articles without citing secondary reliable sources. Wickethewok 06:26, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
It seems that mix projects for Stepmania very rarely have their own Wikipedia articles. All of this info comes either from the project site or the WhoIs site referenced...I'm afraid I don't understand your request. I doubt that one would write an article of the history of Otaku's Dream Mix outside of Wikipedia. Think of this as the first secondary source where otakusdream.com is the primary source. --Naruttebayo 06:33, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Wikipedia is not a publisher of original content and is not supposed to be a secondary source. I will nominate this for deletion - please feel free to comment on the AFD. Wickethewok 06:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
  • What is original research?

Material counts as original research if it:

   * introduces a theory, method of solution, or any other original idea;
   * defines or introduces new terms (neologisms), or provides new definitions of existing terms;
   * introduces an argument without citing a reliable source who has made that argument in relation to the topic of the article; or
   * introduces an analysis, synthesis, explanation, or interpretation of published facts, opinions, or arguments without attributing that analysis, synthesis, explanation, or interpretation to a reliable source who has published the material in relation to the topic of the article.
- From WP:OR

Please tell me which point this article violates. --Naruttebayo 07:18, 11 March 2007 (UTC)