User talk:Narco

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Welcome!

Hello, Narco, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  DV8 2XL 02:02, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks.

Thank you for trying to find a compromise on homosexual agenda. I'm too cynical to think it'll last, but I do appreciate your effort nonetheless. Al 00:42, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know, i didn't realize that because i just starting using Wik this morning. I'm a little confused on how that is considered vandilism and too contradictory. Other people are allowed to leave edits with biased opinions and even hurtful untrue remarks, yet I am not allowed to defend this section? Do i just sit around and let people keep saying that it is all a lie without letting me defend it? i'm sorry... i am just trying to figure out how this all works, and this is a rather personal topic, thank you for helping though. ChristinaAnn 02:57, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

I'm posting this here for the sake of archiving - feel free to respond on your talk page.
Well, the nature of Wikipedia is such that we have to spend sometimes literally hours attempting to make a compromise. I'll be the first to tell you there's systemic bias on Wikipedia, and if you take a look at WP:BIAS, you'll see there are efforts to fix that, but your edit was also biased in that it expressed an opinion about God and such. That particular article is likely rife with biased statements (hence the warning at the top) and I'd be willing to work toward a compromise if you're open to it.
Also, for the record, that was an automated message. I don't think your edit was vandalism as much as a misunderstanding about our point of view policy. :) Narco 03:04, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

mmk, thank you so much, i will try and watch what i am saying better next time, but no, there's no need to bother with a compromise, and i'm sure you are already swamped with other people's as well. thank you though. ChristinaAnn 03:08, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Oh no, it's not a problem. I looked on the website though and it doesn't seem to be talking about the power of God giving him the strength. If you can find somewhere where he said it was through God, we could put that in the section about the shake. The section as it stands now seems neutral though, stating a fact and leaving the reader to decide, no? BTW, don't hesitate to ask if you have any questions or concerns. Narco 03:17, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../n/a/r/User_talk%7ENarco_600f.html"