User talk:Napnet
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Just to say...
I just want everybody that arrives here to know that Napnet is a dedicated editor of Wikipedia, and he will snuff out anything incorrect, improper, or anything that disrupts Wikipedia's purpose as an encyclopedia filled with rich information for anybody to use, or edit. HOORAY FOR NAPNET!!!!!!!!!! 
68.195.123.26 20:06, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- So I guess I am no longer harassing you? Ok.. that's fine --Napnet 18:50, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] New User Box
FSU Helmet box Image:FSU Helmet.png Noles1984 19:31, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:TimeLordGameScreenShot.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:TimeLordGameScreenShot.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:14, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Final Disney infobox design
I'm sure you know by now that I have modified the original infobox heavily, but now Template:Disney attraction infobox is the newer final design. Do you have any oppositions before I convert the original to the newer version? --blm07 21:01, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wakulla Volcano
I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Wakulla Volcano, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Wakulla Volcano. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. TheRingess 04:53, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Chris Rix
Thank you for your work fighting vandals on the Chris Rix page. I have put a notice on the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents concerning the constant vandalism and requested intervention and a check user on some of the accounts involved. Hopefully we can get this problem solved. Quadzilla99 02:29, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- It seems someone(s) wants to gloss over the facts of Chris' poor game play at FSU. Odd the IP that first did it was coming from Rix's hometown...
[edit] Vandalism to Charlie Crist
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Pedro | Talk 20:58, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't vandalize anything... check through the history of the page before you just start passing out vandalism notices. I'll leave this incorrect vandalism notice up till Pedro let's me know what he thinks i did. --Napnet 05:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- Deepest apologies. Looking at this diff it looked like you entered the vandalism. I see now it was historical, and had been missed previously until it's reversion by User:Therequiembellishere. It was unfortunate that you had made the prior edit and got caught up. Again my apologies for the error. Grovels away !Pedro | Talk 08:12, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for your quick reply! Apology accepted.. i see what you mean of how it looked like i added the comment but it had been there for about 5 or 6 edits prior. --Napnet 13:43, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- O God, I'm sorry. I should've realised that. My apologies.Therequiembellishere 21:18, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for your quick reply! Apology accepted.. i see what you mean of how it looked like i added the comment but it had been there for about 5 or 6 edits prior. --Napnet 13:43, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Deepest apologies. Looking at this diff it looked like you entered the vandalism. I see now it was historical, and had been missed previously until it's reversion by User:Therequiembellishere. It was unfortunate that you had made the prior edit and got caught up. Again my apologies for the error. Grovels away !Pedro | Talk 08:12, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
