Talk:Nalsar University of Law
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Criticism Section
I think the second 'critique' has no place in the article. The way it's written makes it seem like this is some sort of third-party criticism, that the college has faced from outsiders. Which is, of course, not true. The article should stick purely to fact. --Necrogen 00:14 hrs 30 December 2005
- The statement of yours is very POV. Third-party criticism is what can be considered to be closer to the truth. But, unless the criticism can be cited and proved, the statement posted has no validity. I am removing the POV part of the article. The first paragraph should not be removed as various magazines like India Today have reported this issue.
- In the future, please cite the links to the relevant articles available on the Internet or other relevant sources. --Andy123 18:50, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] POV problems with the Extracurricular Activities section
Please cite examples and links and authorities as to how NALSAR has excelled in debating and mooting competitions. --Andy123 11:36, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Following are some newpaper clipping which show how NALSAR has excelled in debating and mooting competitions:
The Hindu BusinessLine, 17 April: NALSAR tops Asia Pacific in Jessup competition
Deccan Herland, 20 April: NALSAR tops in Asia-Pacific
--Good bad ugly 12:09, 27 April 2006 (UTC)