User talk:Mythealias

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Click here to leave a new message. Don't forget to provide a subject and to sign your message.

I will be replying here to your messages, unless you ask me not to. 
Edit appropriate section if you want to discuss it further. Thank you. - Myth

Welcome!

Hello, Mythealias, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Just H 20:08, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Bug reporting

You left the IRC channel before I could respond: http://bugzilla.wikipedia.org/WAvegetarian(talk) 08:57, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for the trouble. I had to be afk, so I logged out. Thank you for your help. myth 09:28, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia comments

The Comment article used to include a link to the Wikipedia commenting system within the Publishing subsection. I see that User:Yuser31415 deleted this link on 17 January. I have added the link back with, I hope, more appropriate text. I now appreciate that my revert comment was incorrect and that I should have checked that the link to the Wikipedia commenting mechanism was still there. Sorry for confusing you and I hope you are happy with the new link under Publishing. Derek farn 11:08, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification. myth 16:21, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] lifting line theory

This topic, as a discussion of the vortex distribution over a finite wing, could possibly go on the Horseshoe vortex stub I started? Bob aka Linuxlad 13:59, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

I was trying to point out that downwash is not solely due to the wing tip vortices (as incorrectly pointed out by Jason M (164.107.199.93). Right now I am focusing on gas dynamics topics. If I find time I will try to expand the horseshoe vortex stub. -Myth (Talk) 15:02, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Yes but I think his is the more usual usage amongst aerodynamicists (of whom I am not one). Bob aka Linuxlad 17:54, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

I was wrong on the previous count. The downwash can be attributed to the trailing vortices. Earlier I was under the impression that the bound vortex is also important, but this is not the case. By definition, the downwash is measured at the position of the bound vortex and since a straight vortex line cannot induce velocity on itself, it is incorrect to say that the bound vortex is required to determine the downwash. Sorry for the confusion. -Myth (Talk) 04:02, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Shock Wave

Hi Myth, I left a note on the talk page. Basically I obviously didn't understand your objection. I'd like it if the shock wave/expansion wave pairing was made though. AKAF 10:49, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Phase diagram.png

Hi, I notice you replaced the SVG image Image:Phase-diag.svg with a PNG version Image:Phase diagram.png. SVG images are preferred on Wikipedia because they can be scaled, printed and edited without losing information, and can be translated into other languages much more easily (and even automatically). I'll edit Image:Phase-diag.svg to add your improvements, but in future when you wish to improve diagrams which are currently in SVG it would be better if you were to edit them yourself. There exist free (and very good) SVG editors; I recommend Inkscape. –EdC 14:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestion. I will try using some SVG editor for future edits. -Myth (Talk) 04:01, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Period

Thank you for your fix at the Conjugate gradient method page. I put back a period you removed, since per math style manual, there's got to be a period at the end of formula if the formula is at the end of sentence. Cheers, Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 18:27, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

I did not realize that. Thanks for the letting me know. -- Myth (Talk) 19:50, 3 March 2007 (UTC)