User talk:Mystify85JEC

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Contents

[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Mystify85JEC! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- LittleOldMe 13:38, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

[edit] Good to have you on board

Hi, good of you to acknowledge the welcome, and it's great that you've decided to join the welcoming committee. I'm sure that your sunny disposition (gauged from your user page) will make people feel very welcome.

I hope that the table of links that I left for you will prove as useful to you as I have found it, you may have noticed that I have a modified version of it on my user page. If you wish to leave the same welcoming message when you welcome people then simply type {{subst:user:Kukini/Welcome}} on the talk page. Alternatively, (if you haven't found it already) there is a list of welcoming templates linked to from the welcoming committee page. Once again, welcome on board! LittleOldMe 10:48, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edit Summary

Please can I draw your attention to the edit summary field. Thanks. CiaranG 23:59, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi. Yes, I was trying to say that you hadn't been using the field. Sorry for not being clearer. Here is a fun tool for checking your edit summary usage. Regards, CiaranG 12:47, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RE:SUNY College at Old Westbury

No worries. Sounds good! Gzkn 00:35, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Time-Bombed Skyscraper

I agree, I shouldn't have removed the wikify tag. Thanks for adding it back. NawlinWiki 20:00, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

I've added 1960s achivements for starters. This is far from complete and will go through 1970s 1980s and 1990s. I will also add a filmography table also revelaing actors he has worked with. ALos I hope to find other life details abot his education and background, earlier study and presence behind the camera on set of the major programmes mentioned. Ernst Stavro Blofeld 21:17, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Super Auto

You're welcome. :) ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 20:21, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

I said "starting" meaning I intend to write a fuller article. jeremy Summers is a major tv director definately notable. Do you want me to expand now? Ernst Stavro Blofeld 20:50, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Yes remember me if you have seen all of my tens of tbousands of contributions to wikipedia remember I only start articles I know are worthy and can be expanded. There should be a biography for him somewhere. I was amazed the article wasn't started yet check out his ifilmography!!! Ernst Stavro Blofeld 20:59, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] God board

Not sure it qualifies as patent nonsense, but we'll see if an admin buys it. Could be (a) this was the term used by the author's parents, or (b) there is actually some widespread use within a certain community. Fan-1967 20:52, 9 January 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Fundamental weighting

Do you think I can remove that wikify tag from Fundamental weighting? I read through the Style Manual and cited the entire article, added about 10-20 links, and bolded "fundamental weighting" in the intro paragraph. Anything else need to be done? VivekVish 00:00, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Thank you. You have been exceptionally helpful. VivekVish 00:04, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you

Just a quick note to say thanks for the barnstar. All I need now is a barn to put it on. CiaranG 17:37, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your ER

The link to your editor review page is broken on WP:ER. It looks like there's no ER page for you yet. Are you still working on it? Maybe the name of the actual page is misspelled? Peace, delldot | talk 21:03, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Sure, I'm glad to try and help figure out what's wrong. First of all, did you make the editor review subpage? If not, click on the "Request a Review" button at Wikipedia:Editor review#Requesting reviews. Enter your statement where it says STATEMENT, save and then answer the questions. If you have already made it, I suspect the title is misspelled because Wikipedia:Editor review/Mystify85JEC doesn't exist. You can move the page and edit WP:ER to make sure that the template links to the actual page, not the redirect. I had a quick look at your contribs and didn't see that you had made the page yet, so that's probably it. Keep in touch and let me know whether you get things worked out or if you need more help. Peace, delldot | talk 21:15, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Well, thanks so much for the barnstar, that's very sweet! Don't forget to add your statement to the review page (replace STATEMENT with your personal statement). I will treasure the shiny star on my user page! Peace, delldot | talk 21:40, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for the barnstar!

Much appreciated! With the many petty catfights that pop up in this place, it's good to know that one can still disagree civilly with others! Gzkn 00:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

For clearing one of my rare contributions of conflicts of interest on a recent posting: Quite a scream really. ChaseKiwi 00:40, 12 January 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Responded

I responded to the comment you left on my talk page. Jeremybornstein 23:58, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Semiprotection

Hey Mystify, thanks for the note and the congrats! But I think I'd be too nervous to semiprotect the article for now. I'm still such a n00b admin, it would be my first semiprotection. And as I mentioned in Q4 of my RfA, I plan to be very conservative with the tools. Also, with only a few edits in the past couple days, I'm not sure the article's been hit enough lately to merit protection; as I understand it, usually semiprotection is reserved for when IPs or new users are making so many disruptive edits it's a problem to revert them all. Also, I looked at a couple of the edits, and while they're certainly not appropriate, they're not as simple vandalism as I'd be comfortable with protecting a page against (you know, like "AARON IS GAY!" Now that I'm comfortable with protecting against!). If it has even the slightest hint of content dispute about it, I'd be very nervous about semiprotecting. Have you had dialog with the users? Explained what's wrong with the edits and why they're against policy? If they keep doing it, I'd suggest bringing the issue to WP:RFPP, where the admins are more experienced than me and probably less nervous ninnies. Keep me updated about this situation if anything changes or if I've missed something significant. Sorry not to fulfill your request, I do want to be accessible, so don't hesitate to come to me with stuff in the future. Peace, delldot | talk 01:04, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Editor review/Mystify85JEC

Hey, I gave you a very belated review! I thought I'd mention it, since it's been so long you might have forgotten about it. If you're happy with the amount of reviewing you got, you may want to archive it after you've read it (or ask me to), since that page is so long and you're unlikely to get any more reviews. Anyway, hope it's helpful! Peace, delldot talk 00:21, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../m/y/s/User_talk%7EMystify85JEC_aacb.html"