User talk:Musicpvm

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives
1 2

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Kingofqueens.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kingofqueens.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:42, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KROQ Top 106.7 Countdowns (2nd nomination)

Hi Musicpvm, I've just closed this AfD as no consensus again. However, this is by no means suggestive of a precedent on radio countdown lists. As this appears to be a systemic issue, I encourage you to proceed with a Request for comment on the issue of countdown lists, if you feel strongly about it. Many thanks -- Samir धर्म 05:57, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] pls revert

Ethnicity should generally not be emphasized in the opening unless it is relevant to the subject's notability, I would agree. But here I believe that it is relevant to the subject's notability. For example, she is listed on the wikipedia list of jewish blacks. Pls revert. Tx. --Epeefleche 04:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Actually, we have lists for every ethnicity and religion you can think of on Wikipedia. That doesn't mean everyone on those lists should violate MOS in their header. Mad Jack 15:32, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: La Toya Jackson

Hi musicpvm. Thanks for the note on my talk page. I really should have put that request on your talk page the same as I asked you to do for me. That way you would have gotten the New Messages box instead of having to find it on your watchlist or stumble across it on the article talk page. Thanks for the reference. Happy editing! --Cromwellt|talk|contribs 18:41, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

i think u need to stop making biased changes on ashanti's page. if ashanti is not hip hop as well as r&b neither is mary.Danotorious1jd 02:55, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

that 's what i was saying she is hip hop soul and r&B but you keep taking it out. so are we seeing eye to eyeDanotorious1jd 03:54, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pop ballad

Please refer to articles Long Black Veil (song), The Most Beautiful Girl in the World (Prince song), Still Waiting (Prince song), Only You (Harry Connick Jr), Long Black Veil (song), Diamonds and Pearls (song), Do Me, Baby etc.

"Pop ballad" is a genre, like rock ballad. Some R&B/soul/pop musicians experience with this genre (like in Unfaithful (song), Kelly Clarkson is the best modern example) and some focus on this genre (as far as I know Prince is the most famous). Pop ballad is non-danceable pop music, influenced by classical music, and usually having very melodic lyrics. I hope that clears the topic. Psychomelodic (people think Baba Ram Dass ^{write your own!}) 14:12, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems with Image:Kingofqueens.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Kingofqueens.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Abu Badali 02:25, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Raja Yoga controversy

Dear Hinduism Project editors,

There is a controversy on the Hinduism regarding Raja Yoga. Please read the debate on the Hinduism discussion page. Your comments are requested on the Hinduism discussion page to help resolve the controversy. Thank you. 68.239.78.172 15:05, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:Jyotiraditya Madhavrao Scindia

Since you made input on the CfD for Category:Hindu politicians, I would request you to take a look at the cat and the talk page listed above for a controversy.Bakaman _Bakatalk 01:55, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] An award

		The Minor Barnstar
		For your work on categorization. utcursch

P.S. Please feel free to move the award to your user page, I didn't know where to put it on your page (which is full of userbox), so I put it here, on your talk page. :) utcursch | talk 10:04, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Page move

Since you participated in the last survey, just a couple months ago, you may be interested to know there is yet another proposal to move Los Angeles, California. Jonathunder 05:17, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Stop removing genres from articles

I don't know what makes you think Beyoncé is a pop musician. Just because she has some danceable songs? Hopefully, there are still non-poppish contemporary R&B singers, and Beyoncé is definitely one of these. No way "Naughty Girl" and "Check On It" are pop songs. Who cares if "Check On It" did well on Billboard Pop 100? Amerie's "1 Thing" and Alicia Keys' "Unbreakable" also charted the Pop 100, and they aren't pop songs. Also, Beyoncé's music sounds totally different from actual pop-R&B singers' one (Ashanti, Mariah Carey, Jennifer Lopez et al.). By the way, she has more soul-oriented songs than pop ones, just listen to Dangerously In Love. Unfortunately, B'Day didn't do the same... All I'm trying to say is, I didn't mean to be annoying or something, I just can't stand this whole pop thing. That's it. Funk Junkie 20:17, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thief

Just wanted to let you know I reverted your change of the "Thief" article for Our Lady Peace. Unbeknownst to many there is no naming convention that favors the band name over the song release year in the title. There is no reason to change this.— OL P 1999 22:44, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pink

Thanks for the information about the Pink move. I have now gone through the requested move steps and the discussion appears at Talk:P!nk#Requested_move. I hope I got it right. Wryspy 21:08, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Template:Evanescence

Out of curiosity, why did you remove the includeonly for Category:Evanescence from this page? -- Huntster ^{T • @ • C} 02:58, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Understood. I knew the function of course, but I supposed that it would be useful to have all of those in the Evanescence category, and then further break down into the albums and songs subcats. Ah well, I'll keep it in mind for the future. -- Huntster ^{T • @ • C} 14:45, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hi!

Hi, will you help me get Donna Summer to WP:GA status. SunStar Net 12:39, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for being calm

Wanted to express appreciation for some of the more mellow corrections made on the Talk:Beyoncé Knowles page. (People there sure get heated ... the lengthy debate on what notes she can or can't hit is just mind-blowing for me.) I especially liked the polite explanation to the person who thought a lot of material had been deleted, where you explained about using the page history. I had just read suggestions about that at Don't bite the newcomers. Best wishes to you, and keep cool. Lawikitejana 21:52, 1 November 2006 (UTC) a fellow Heroes viewer, BTW

[edit] Category:Categories named after television series

I wonder, when you added Category:Categories named after television series to the TV serise categories, why did you delete the existing categories without checking if the main articles depended on those existing categories for categorization? For example, America's Got Talent relied on Category:America's Got Talent to be included in Category:2000s TV shows in the United States, Category:NBC network shows, etc. Reading Wikipedia:Categorization and subcategories#Topic article rule, I realize this dependence is wrong. But it would have been nice if such a dependency in the main articles was fixed first. Tinlinkin 08:27, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Indian Americans , Sexual Predators

Not enough reason to justify that RV. Talk:Indian_American#Sexual_Predators.2C_Indian_Americans Would like to know what you think. Did you even read the sources or watch the video in MSNBC? --பராசக்தி 20:11, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Harry Potter


Hello, Musicpvm. Over at WikiProject Harry Potter we're trying to compile a list of active participants. Your name, along with all other project participants, has been placed on the inactive list. If you'd like to get involved again, please place your name back on the active list, and take a look at the project talk page for the latest happenings.

RHB(AWB) 23:15, 30 December 2006 (UTC), on behalf of WPHarry Potter

[edit] hi

As you were a participant in this discussion you may want to see the new avatar of the discussion.Baka man 16:09, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Survivor Cd.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Survivor Cd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 02:01, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Tamia.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tamia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

[edit] Talk:The Real World: San Francisco

Hi. It seems we have a possible edit war on the The Real World: San Francisco article. If you could respond to the post I made on its talk page, it would be appreciated. Nightscream Nightscream 04:56, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Floetry.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Floetry.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

[edit] Beyoncé Knowles

Do you have any other sources other then the ones you are using? The current ones use a video that does not have a clear identity of the person being filmed. You claimed that "received much attention in mainstream media". You should provide better sourcing. One last thing. This section has no relevance to the main article and should be moved to the Peta article. Purgatory Fubar ^Converse or Snafu 20:23, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../m/u/s/User_talk%7EMusicpvm_73db.html"