Talk:Musilanguage

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 12 August 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article reads like original research. I am not a musicologist, although I do pursue an active interest in musical history. I can believe this might be a real theory, but could you please provide citations from peer-reviewed journals (i.e. not reviews of Brown's book) which show that this concept is widely discussed or accepted. Thanks. - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 10:46, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

From what I can find via Google, this appears to be an alternate term for Tonal language, to describe languages such as Thai, yet not widely used. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 05:49, Dec. 22, 2005
That would explain why there were so few references to this terminology. Unfortunately this appears to be a drive-by so there's little hope of engaging the author in discussion. Oh, see also Musical language. - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 20:44, 22 December 2005 (UTC)


Hey–I'm happy to see that this article has generated a little bit of interest. Before writing this, I wasn't much familar with Wikipedia, and I'm still a bit astounded that anyone found the article and found it worthy of comment; that in and of itself seems like a cause for enthusiasm to me. A bit of background on the situation: I'm an undergrad whose primary interest is music, and I wrote it for an evolutionary linguistics class that I took this past quarter (contributing to Wikipedia was part of the project). It is indeed based solely on Brown's research, and I would not contest that it could indeed be made more appropriate for a wikipedian context, both by filling out the references and giving it more of an encylopedic flavor in its content (it undeniably has some of the elements of a persuasive essay). I see it as a first step to a good encyclopedic analysis of this topic, and I would very much encourage anyone with more extensive knowledge to modify it as they see fit. Thanks to Uncle G for adding some (very cool) links to the bibliography, and I hope that they can be of use to anyone interested in further developing this. I have no plans to do so myself at the moment, but this may well change in the future, particularly if someone else contributes some new tidbit that sparks further interest. -Sincerely, the author