Talk:Multiple sequence alignment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	MCB Portal This article is within the scope of the Molecular and Cellular Biology WikiProject. To participate, visit the WikiProject for more information. The current monthly improvement drive is Signal transduction.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid	This article is on a subject of mid-importance within molecular and cellular biology.
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

Multiple sequence alignment (reviewed version) has been listed as a good article under the good-article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a review.

[edit] Good article nomination

My suggestions:

• in section Dynamic programming and computational complexity + Progressive alignment construction (after finishing the article, I must say in nearly all sections), there are several external links that should be converted into internal references
• Maybe not so important, but a reference for that statement: "PRRP performs best when refining an alignment previously constructed by a faster method." would be useful
• "which is also available as a web portal": this kind of sentences should be all converted into reference. It looks bad in the article.
• What about external links section? I now the article is full of external links (see above), but there must be some links writing about MSA.

Anyway, absolutely great article, I'm not an expert in that topic, but I could easily read it. Congrat! NCurse _work 07:03, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm glad it's readable by a knowledgeable non-expert; bioinformatics can be very difficult to explain well. I agree that not all the external links are written/segued into very well, but integrating them into the text was a (semi-)conscious decision also followed in the parent sequence alignment and the (siblings, I guess?) structural alignment and computational phylogenetics. I figure that many readers are probably looking for a way to actually perform a sequence alignment, and if they find a method they like, it's much easier to have the external link in the relevant paragraph than at the bottom of the article. Tracking down the current download page/web portal from the original paper can also be a challenge, since these things change hosting/get absorbed by larger projects/follow a postdoc when he sets up his own lab/etc. On rereading I do notice a couple of programs that have an external link but no literature reference, so I'll clean that up.

The PRPP statement belongs to ref #9, which appears in the immediately preceding sentence as well. I added a second note - do you think that looks redundant? I'll look for useful links tomorrow - there's lots of them but the signal-to-noise ratio is not so great. Opabinia regalis 07:57, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

FYI, I added external links and references to the tools that were paperless, and cleaned up some of the web portal links. I did leave the direct external links to the relevant tools, but hopefully a bit more integrated. What do you think? Opabinia regalis 23:37, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Some things left:

• "A web portal and download site is available at MUSCLE."
• "A database-search technique based on HMM methods is available in the program HMMer.[14]"
• "A server for locating motifs in unaligned sequences is located at BLOCKS.".....etc

I think the external links (not internal references) can stay in the article, but they should be merged into the paragraphs, because now these are lonely statements. Anyway everything seems to be good to me. NCurse _work 13:12, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

I think I got them all, thanks. Opabinia regalis 04:06, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Great work, thanks for the reactions. Congrat! :) It's now a good article. NCurse _work 14:47, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the review! Opabinia regalis 01:03, 13 September 2006 (UTC)