User:Morton devonshire/smellysocks
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Suspected Sockpuppets
[edit] The Conspiracy Theory
- B_____/S_____ as Sockpuppets -- why: Both hover at 9/11 conspiracy theories, and patrol the page like wildcats. B_____ goes off the radar screen early Jan, stops editing, except for welcome messages on S_____ talk pages, etc. S_____ starts editing early Jan, immediately posts very sophisticated user page and demonstrates sophisticated tagging and editing skill immediately, while feigning newbie weakness. S_____ accidentally responds to a perceived affront to B_____, and leaves smoochie-smoochie messages on B_____'s user page. Don't get me wrong, they're both interesting editors, and kind of fun to spar with. Both are also so sold on the 911 "Truth" Movement propaganda (yes, those are scare quotes) that they have trouble seeing just how biased their edits are. Morton devonshire 03:05, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The Alternative Explanation
They just both smoke the same dope. Morton devonshire 18:02, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Definitely Sockpuppets
[edit] The Conspiracy Theory
- [unnamed G1]/[unnamed G2]/[unnamed G3] as Sockpuppets -- why: G1 feels insulted; G2 responds to purported insult, forgetting I'm actually talking to G1; G3 responds with retaliatory stalking-editing -- all within a space of 3 minutes. Funny stuff! Morton devonshire 02:32, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The Alternative Theory
They are pedantics! Morton devonshire 18:03, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Finding Your Inner Sockpuppet
See User:Morton devonshire/Finding your inner sockpuppet
[edit] Permanent Weasel List
[edit] Weasel
I've initiated a permanent weasel list for those pedantics who make Wikipedia a less pleasant place.
[edit] Here's my first nominee
- "I stalk all martyrs, it really makes them sweat. --G1 00:17, 21 January 2006 (UTC)" (from the administrator board)
This guy is supposedly an Administrator, and I'm supposed to assume good faith. Screw that. Morton devonshire 23:33, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
-
- I admire your generosity my friend. Morton devonshire 08:13, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] My second nominee
- User:G3 -- this thing put me on its permanent watch list because I accused it of liberal bias. If it is an administrator, Wikipedia is truly lost. Morton devonshire 02:57, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] My third nominee
previous ARBCOM case involving ED. Basically, it is considered an attack site, and no material from ED or links to ED are allowed.
[edit] Sift for Socks
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Horowitz Freedom Center and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FrontPage magazine.com (2nd nomination)