Talk:Moreh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Commentary moved from the article:

Is this entry necessary for a general interest encyclopaedia? Just because Easton's public domain 1800s Christian encyclopaedia has thousands of entries doesn't mean that this encyclopaedia needs to do so. If we followed this kind of micro-entry format, we'd end up with thousands of tiny entries for Christianity, Judaism, Islam, etc. I totally agree that Wikipedia needs many comprehensive articles on religion, but Wikipedia is not meant to be a religious dictionary or encyclopaedia. All I am asking is that we make sure that our entries are comprehensive, and not unnecessarily fractured into micro-entries. Sub-entries should only be created when there is a compelling need to do so. RK

[edit] Wikified

I did a little wikification work and cleanup, but more cleanup definitely needs to be done. This page could possibly be turned into a disambig, what with all the different definitions of the word. I am continuing on with wikification of other articles (there's a huge backlog) ... good luck! JubalHarshaw 18:01, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

took out the dismabig area to a different page.--sin-man 09:08, 6 November 2006 (UTC)