Talk:Monokini
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- There were until now much more old talk on this page, but I think it was more related to microkinis than monokinis, so I move it to Talk:Microkini. -*Ulla* 21:37, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image
I uh.... -ahem- think that a picture would GREATLY improve this article-- Damien Vryce
- I added two pictures here the other day. Do you like them? -*Ulla* 19:50, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
-
- eeee, since i now that the woman on the picters is the one from voyageur message to extraterestials ....
- it's rather comic ... like if i'm seening saint mary in a bikini or something like that.--Pixel ;-) 08:15, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Oh, you're funny :-) . Well, I made them intentionally so that they should just illustrate the "idea" of the suits. -*Ulla* 21:14, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
-
ummm when would people use these?
[edit] The microkini is NOT a monokini
Although most microkini-wearing females will occasionally go without the top, manufacturers and vendors selling microkinis sell these suits usually as top and bottom sets. Thus, there is absolutely no reason for the microkini to be merged with monokini; in other words, the microkini is NOT a subcategory of the monokini (which is a female-only design); instead, for the females it is a very skimpy version of a bikini or a one-piece suit and for the males, a very skimpy thong or g-string. Plain and simple. Elp gr 15:20, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- Good thinking. By moving it to its own article, we're avoiding confusion. Elp gr 19:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Bikini Atoll
This article makes a point of clarifying the etymology of monokini as being flawed, but it doesn't specify the etymology of bikini as used in Bikini Atoll, and neither does that article. It's still possible based on this articles text that monokini is the correct construction, can we get a source that at least specifies that bikini is not derived from Greek? Vicarious 09:13, 7 March 2007 (UTC)