Talk:Moloch (Mortal Kombat)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Mortal Kombat WikiProject logo This article, template, or image is part of WikiProject Mortal Kombat, an attempt to structure and organize all Mortal Kombat-related information on Wikipedia, placing emphasis on canonicity. If you wish to help, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on its quality.


Moloch non-playable? Who ever heard of such a thing? I have the arm, and he is playable. Someone should edit this article with correct information please. Thanx ...

Robot569 00:26, 2 January 2006 (UTC) Some people need to talk about it.Robot569 00:30, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Being playable through a cheat device is much different than being playable through normal means. The S 04:01, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Image

It appears that, at some point, somebody uploaded a picture using the file name moloch.jpg, which is unrelated to this character and was used in two articles. This caused the picture of the Mortal Kombat character to be overwritten. I downloaded the previous version of moloch.jpg (the one of the MK character) and uploaded it under a new file name. Jeff Silvers 05:19, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Playable

I included the fact that Moloch can become playable with the support of third-party devices.

Goroliath.

  • It should be added he will become playable as he has been confirmed for Armegeddon.

[edit] Fighting Style

I believe Moloch's fighting style has officially been noted as "Brute Strength". However, we may wish to wait until Armageddon before we add anything concrete. The S 04:01, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

I dont think he will have a weapon, a video on the mortal kombat amargeddon web site doesnt even have a name for his fighting style, indicating that he can not switch to anything, so his ball was removed for some reson by the game creators.

[edit] Character Analysis

Can this be confirmed? It seems to be heavily biased in terms of point-of-view. Mista Tee001 19:27, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

I removed all of the OR/POV material, leaving behind very little actual content. EVula // talk // // 19:42, 8 February 2007 (UTC)