User talk:Mobile 01/Mediation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Mediation request
A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.
[edit] FYI
User_talk:Essjay#Hello_Essjay Essjay is the cordinator for the mediation. The person you are supposed to ask question too.
- Should Terrorific (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log) less than 13 edits on wikipedia, Ekun (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log) 3 edits on wiipedia, Leaders100 (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log) who never edited the Firestone or Bridgestone page and hasn't edited wikipedia since 12 September 2006, be a part of this mediation?
Can you remove those three inactive and new users from the mediation? I am still confused (baffled) why you added them in the first place. Everyone else has agreed to the mediation.
Where is Japan Project anyway? Why did you choose these three editors?
Thanks Travb (talk) 11:56, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't ask that question, you did.[1]
- I explained why I chose those specific editors on the mediation page. They have been invited to provide opinion because the Bridgestone page is part of Project Japan. As your issue relates to merging an American Companies 100 year history with a Japanese Companies 80 year History it is important that should you procede and actually merge the two, that Japanese readers understand why the history of the American Firestone Company is now being shown as Japanese History. These 3 editors are experts in their field of Japanese History relating to Industry and as such are in the best position to provide an objective view on the merge you recommend.
Mobile 01Talk 12:14, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- I often move comments to the persons talk page to keep the flow of the conversation, or delete the comments if they are already there. User_talk:Travb#FYI. Have a grreeatt weekend. Travb (talk) 14:08, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Request for Mediation
 |
A Request for Mediation to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Firestone Tire and Rubber Company.
|
[edit] Request for Mediation
|
A Request for Mediation to which you are a party has been accepted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Firestone Tire and Rubber Company2.0.
|
[edit] Speaking of Firestone
I thought this was appropriate: Wikipedia:Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass. Cheers. MortonDevonshire Yo · 19:45, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Mediation for Firestone
Ive agreed to take on mediation. We can get started now at the mediation talk page, as there are multiple articles involved. Thanks -Ste|vertigo 00:46, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Mediation takes place on the discussion page Mediation Discussion
[edit] Personal attack warning
I suggest you revert this edit and the subsequent ones in which you reformatted your comments and apologize to Travb for the personal attacks. Comments like these are completely unproductive during mediation and continued references to other editors as "vandals" and making unsupported accusations of sock puppetry can result in involuntary wikibreaks. Travb can be a little touchy at times and egging him on isn't going to help anything. Thanks. --Bobblehead 07:03, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Extremely inappropriate tampering of discussion
Mobile, you removed some of the comments you made,[2] stating in comment the reason was because I suggested it. I did not, and removing the text as you did gives the reader the impression that my admonishing comments directed at your comments are instead directed at Travb's comments. Please restore them now. Note, if you want to correct yourself in talk pages, a simple strikethrough will suffice to indicate your change.-Stevertigo 23:24, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
