Talk:Mobile Internet access worldwide
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Deletion
This page should be rewritten or proposed for speedy deletion. Canaima 23:58, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Dear Canaima,
I don't understand why you believe that this article is "Blatant advertising. Page which exclusively promote a company, product, group, service or person and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Note that simply having a company, product, group, service or person as its subject does not qualify an article for this criterion."
This article is actually listing the solutions with *all of almost all (the main)* the italian and hungarian (mobile) telephonic companies and wants to be a mobile version of this analog Wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadband_Internet_access_worldwide.
To say that it "exclusively promotes a company" imho is a blatant lie.
And what's the advantage of removing external links? this page is here for helping foreign visitors of any country to know and obtain the best mobile connectivity solution. The external links have two main purposes:
- to help foreign people, that don't understand the local language, to obtain the choosed solution once there. It's a practical help for international travelers. It's the kind of practical information that I would like to have when I travel to other countries
- to cite the source, making anyone easily able to verify it and eventually update the changes
Instead of just condemning the article, why don't you tell us specifically what you don't like of it?
--84.223.86.224 18:30, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Couldn't this page be merged with one of these almost redundant topics?
Couldn't this page be merged with one of these topics? They're almost redundant.
CaribDigita 20:24, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Those articles are interesting but they are limited to the names of the phone network operators.
- This article should list the commercial offers (solution with speed, coverage, price) of all the mobile (that include for example cellular, widespread Wi-Fi, Wi-Max) operators. --84.223.121.241 23:22, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- IMHO. That will be tough on Wikipedia. Nothing can sound like an advertistment or else the deletionist members of Wikipedia will have a field day with it. CaribDigita 23:27, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Look at the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadband_Internet_access_worldwide. It's exactly the same thing as this article should be but for fixed lines. In my opinion it's a very useful article. Do you think that it should be deleted as well? --84.223.121.241 22:46, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Me. I don't really believe in deleting any article unless it is a fake articl, or someting that has no value to anyone. I beleive in leaving most articles alone because sooner or later they will get better. It usually just takes the right person to happen by and contribute a little something extra to take an artical from a bad-state of being on upward to a better state of being. I've had several article deleted simply because I didn't have enough time to maintain them all everyday to bring the up to a better standard so I don't wish it on anyone. Once that happens its a huge turn off. Esp. if you have put some time and effort into it. CaribDigita 01:27, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Perfect. I hope that others agree with us. Funnily someone (not me! I swear) lately added to the page I mentioned (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadband_Internet_access_worldwide) the header "This article is becoming very long. Please consider summarizing or transferring content to subtopic articles".
- Therefore I hope that someone will transfuse the mobile-commercial part of it in this article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.223.78.41 (talk) 15:37, 1 April 2007 (UTC).
-
-
-
