Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Tulips

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Daniel Bryant 09:36, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Tulips

This project, which apparently deals with tulips or amrita or maybe both, has no real content and does not give any indication as to which articles it might deal with. It also has no listed members. John Carter 20:40, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete for lacking content. Honestly, how much collaboration is necessary for tulips? I think BJAODN needs a WikiProject section - oops, I shouldn't have mentioned BJAODN... :) YechielMan 05:41, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep this is the example project used in the documentation on WikiProject organization at WP:COUNCIL. Since it is an example of how WikiProjects are organized, it is not intended to have a great deal of content. Slambo (Speak) 10:57, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, it wasn't intended to be an actually existent project; all the needed example material is in the guide itself. Kirill Lokshin 11:18, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, this WikiProject is inactive . There's no need for a specific WikiProject on tulips or amrita. This page is redundant and what project collaboration is need for working on a specific flower family? Its very unlikely someone will add content to the WikiProject and there is no content. Terence 11:19, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
• BJAODN it. <cough> Apparently WP Tulips is the example project given in the WikiProject Council guide (as mentioned above); it's been created and deleted before as a test page. It might not do any harm to have such a test page but not as a live WikiProject, so delete (could probably be speedied as a recreation/test). --kingboyk 11:47, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. This is clearly vandalism, just a copy of the project guide version. No real members, only one edit to the main page (not counting mfd notification), no talk on talk page. Branson03 14:00, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete for a few reasons. 1) It is not active. 2) There is not enough collaboration needed for tullips for a wikiproject. James, La gloria è a dio 16:05, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete It contradicts it's self, contains litle information (that could be changed) and seems inactive.Tellyaddict 16:13, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: As per comments above. Inactive does not help wikipedia.--Historyfan 21:54, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Not enough scope for a WikiProject. · AO ^Talk 00:44, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, seems like a test page. Either way, it is not a WikiProject. That said, if someone decided to start an actual WikiProject, and obtained enough users, with enough interest, then I don't see why it should be speedied under CSD G4... but that is not the case right now. Titoxd^{(?!? - cool stuff)} 02:02, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.