Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Treaties

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy keep, nomination withdrawn and other delete positions have been retracted. Non-admin closing. -- Ned Scott 18:52, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Treaties

Project has only one active member, and no activity at all other than addition of deletion tag in over a year. Listed active member is being informed of this discussion. Badbilltucker 17:48, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

You might want to inform User:Deucalionite, who works extensively on treaty articles. Adam Bishop 18:11, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

User:Deucalionite has been informed of this discussion. Badbilltucker 18:37, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as abandoned. Yomangani^talk 23:29, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep - This article is not abandoned. Deucalionite 15:48, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep. The project page is certainly inactive, but at least one user is active in the project itself. Keeping the project page does no real harm. --Ginkgo100 ^{talk · e@} 20:10, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I don't see how one user can use a project to collaborate with themselves.. I could understand a keep for an inactive project that had some existing guidelines or advice that was applicable even if there was no activity. However, this is not the case. -- Ned Scott 05:33, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - User:Deucalionite has just recently joined the project, seemingly with an intention to revive it. On that basis, I believe that the project should now be given the same oppotunity to gain new members that any other new project would. If the rules permit, I would also like to withdraw my nomination for this page's deletion on the basis of this attempt to revive the project. Badbilltucker 14:41, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Badbilltucker as no longer abandoned. Yomangani^talk 14:43, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, as the others have said. -- Ned Scott 18:44, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.