Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject The Naked Brothers Band

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle 18:00, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject The Naked Brothers Band

Although I'm sure this project has the best of intentions, this topic simply isn't large or broad enough to maintain anything. With only maybe 10-15 articles that they may be interested in, it seems unnessecary to make a WikiProject with only 3 members. — Moe 02:08, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. The topic is just too small of a scope for a Wikiproject. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 15:34, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I agree, it does seem to have good intentions but the scope is just too small and it says on the WikiProject Council/Proposals that a wikiproject may benefit if it has at least five members, unfortunately this is not obeying this.Tellyaddict 16:34, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete — Even though I'm a member, I always knew the Naked Brothers Band WikiProject was too small for Wikipedia. I agree with deletion, because a WikiProject can't have so little articles and members. Wait until the Naked Brothers Band gets bigger. — JuWiki (Talk <> Resources) 21:17, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I don't think that this subject is even deserving of an article, let alone a WikiProject

GizwidgetThe gnome

• Delete: I agree, good intentions, but topic is too narrow for a whole project. If this topic really requires this much attention, I suggest a collaboration on the main article.--Wiki Fanatic | Talk 07:59, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.