Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Tenacious D

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Tenacious D

Sorry, guys, but we really do not need an entire Wikiproject devoted to one act. Wikipedia is not a fansite or MySpace.

  • We already have Wikipedia:WikiProject The KLF, Wikipedia:WikiProject Pink Floyd, Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles. Those wikiprojects have been very productive in getting the articles, related to corresponding groups to FA or GA status. I don't see any reason why this wikiproject should be nipped in the bud, when it can, potentially, improve Tenacious D articles significantly.  Grue  12:59, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Per above. We do not have a need for this project.--James, La gloria è a dio 21:52, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. I even had to find out what this is all about so I am not involved. There are more partcipants than on many Projects and there are quite a few articles that it covers. I see no reason to delete. If the participants need it, why not? --Bduke 01:38, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Enough articles fall under it to warrant centralized collaboration. It's not particularly active but it has only been 3 months and there are plenty of members. –Pomte 02:14, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. The project is not being abused as a WP space fansite. As long as they're working in the Wikipedia spirit to improve the place, I can't possibly see the problem. All of the projects are collections of Wikipedians with common interests and hobbies. I see no reason to single out one or the other as improper because of the project's topic. To me, that's the absolutely wrong measuring stick to use. Vassyana 04:11, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Many editors on it, we have WikiProjects on other bands. Abeg92contribs 18:06, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../m/i/s/Wikipedia%7EMiscellany_for_deletion_Wikipedia%7EWikiProject_Tenacious_D_2634.html"