Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Trillion pool
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete 7D/2K gives a very comfortable 77% deletion consensus. Xoloz 15:55, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Trillion pool
- See what I wrote at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Billion pool. Georgia guy 18:38, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
- DRV Notice, This debate has been restarted due to irregularities that has been raised in deletion review. I have no opinon on this matter. - Mailer Diablo 17:40, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - It's time for one new pool to begin. The Eleventy-Billion Pool has gotten very large, so imaginative users should have a cleaner space to make "guesses". As far as I can tell, it is meant to be a non-serious pool, and it has started to develop a bit already. I see no reason why this can't stay. Timrem 19:05, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Too soon, maybe reopen when we reach 1 billion Ydam 10:46, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- It was cute for a day or two but the joke's over. Time to delete. Rossami (talk) 05:23, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. —Ruud 14:01, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Let's not start a trend of filling up our administrative namespace with WPcruft. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 15:32, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
Keep. This is about the zillionth time this has been listed here. 24.127.224.173 17:54, 27 May 2006 (UTC)sock. —Ruud 20:55, 27 May 2006 (UTC)- Delete per what I wrote at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Billion pool; with the only difference is that it is to be re-created when the number of articles reaches 100,000 million and the preferred title is "Wikipedia:Million-million pool". Georgia guy 00:27, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- Very Strong Keep. Every sort of fun on Wikipedia is being thrown out the window. Let us at least keep this. ~Linuxerist
E/L/T 11:39, 28 May 2006 (UTC) - Delete, impossible. --Terence Ong 15:56, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, totally pointless. -Big Smooth 05:30, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
