Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Parodies/Encyclopedia Of Stupid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. >Radiant< 08:43, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Parodies/Encyclopedia Of Stupid

It does not belong on Wikipedia, not even on Wikipedia namespace. bogdan 10:51, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Comment This page was moved to the Wikpedia: namespace following discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Encyclopedia Of Stupid about concerns over notability, verifiability, original research and vanity (see the specific vanity reason). --Alf ^melmac 11:03, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Delete. This page does not seem to be a Wikipedia guideline after all, and it seemed to have nothing to deal with Wikipedia. --Smcafirst or Nick • Sign • Chit-Chat • I give at 15:26, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Not just does this certainly not belong in the WP space, it doesn't belong in any space whatsoever. -- Kicking222 21:31, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as above -Doc^g 02:43, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, nothing to do with us, why bother? Terence Ong 06:55, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
• strong keep like Uncyclopedia.**My Cat inn @ (talk)** 13:23, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

  Uncyclopedia is notable. I've even seen it featured in newspapers. :-) bogdan 13:25, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

  Well, I agree it's like Uncyclopedia. Both are not funny. Danny Lilithborne 21:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

  Yes it is. -Amarkov ^blah_edits 01:52, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

  To me that page is as funny as abortion. But hey, YMMV. Danny Lilithborne 23:23, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Waste of space. yandman 13:44, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Terence Ong. Danny Lilithborne 21:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete 515 Ghits for a website, 3rd result is the WP page. I don't think it's notable enough to be moved to the namespace. James086^{Talk | Contribs} 11:51, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - does not satisfy WP:WEB; (failed) copy/fork of Unencyclopedia. Anthonycfc ^{[T • C]} 01:54, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.