Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Outoftuneviolin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Deleted --Cyde Weys 00:57, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Outoftuneviolin

This page is totally useless, since you can spot a sockpuppet of OoTV just by looking for "Outoftune" in its name or blanking articles and filling them with insults against "evolutionists". It only glorifies OoTV. Delete per WP:DENY. -- FrostytheSnowman ^('sup?) 22:06, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

• Comment- There are two redirects to the page in question- WP:OOTV and WP:OoTV.
• Delete, as with all long term abuse sub-pages. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 00:36, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, WP:BEANS Anomo 00:50, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Oops, I shouldn't have mentioned his MO. -- FrostytheSnowman ^('sup?) 02:16, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki to countervandalism.org as per above delete reasons. Long term abuse pages don't belong here. MER-C 03:06, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:DENY Naconkantari 18:53, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. I am able to recognize this vandal because I was around when he started. However, how are newbies supposed to know that this kind of vandal needs to be taken to WP:AIV without any need to use warning templates? Waiting for a vandalism after a {{Blatantvandal-n}} warning is issued means more vandalism will get through before this block. Jesse Viviano 00:04, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • An admin can just look for OoTV-style vandalism on the articles he like to vandalize, (see Wikipedia:Favorite pages of banned users) and block accounts used for those vandalism. -- FrostytheSnowman ^('sup?) 02:30, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep-Does wikipedia now have a policy to delete all user vandal subpages? He has a 100 confirmend sockpuppets and he is still active. Lets keep this page up for a while untill his vandalism slows down.---Scott3 _{Talk Contributions Count: 950+} 01:21, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • His vandalism has slowed down. This is the first edit from his last suspected sock, User:OFVWT, and this is the first (and only) edit by User:Outoftuneviolin's son; and these edits are more than 24 hours apart. Well, he used to create a lot of socks about a week ago. And he doesn't even vandalize Violin (his favorite target) anymore, even after it has been unprotected. -- FrostytheSnowman ^('sup?) 02:30, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all - utterly useless - no-one has yet given any coherent argument for any of these. --Doc 09:31, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Comment: This has been done twice before: here and later here. Both were closed as keep. 68.39.174.238 17:05, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:DENY, no need for us to host a tribute to this lamer. — GT 17:51, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete in agreement with all deletes votes above. Bastique▼^parler _voir 18:37, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete totally unnecessary. --pgk^(talk) 19:59, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.