Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Don't be a duck

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was, "What we have here, folks, is a case of 7D/4K. This is not something I'm comfortable calling a deletion consensus, and I don't want to expend great thinking effort on this case. I'll redirect as a compromise." Xoloz 17:34, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Don't be a duck

Yeah, it made me laugh. So did WP:FROWN. But the solution to people adding garbage onto Wikipedia is not to add more garbage; were this added by an anon, it'd be immediately tagged as vandalism and deleted. Delete Tijuana Brass^E@ 00:15, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

• Yeah it's funny but it's nonsense at the end of the day. BJAODN and delete. -- Francs2000 00:20, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Conditional keep, if explanatory text is added. — May. 24, '06 [00:22] <freak|talk>
• Redirect to the actual policy/essay. -- stillnotelf is invisible 00:49, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, useful policy. We don't want ducks to run the encyclopedia. Kusma (討論) 02:50, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete. If I'd stumbled across this page I'd have added Template:db-nonsense. --Hughcharlesparker 09:42, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete with a yawn per Francs2000. I checked what links there and it will be no great loss. Martinp 13:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• BJAODN and delete as per Francs. Pegasus1138^{Talk | Contribs | Email} ---- 03:23, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Zap (delete) all ducks in prams and prepare a feast. --TantalumTelluride 03:44, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• LOL  Grue  14:36, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete but I laughed :) Oreo man 14:38, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Duckeep. —Nightstallion (?) 07:42, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep please - this is a good corrolary, and can be used to point to the real policy. It will also keep this space from being abused. --Femur 04:21, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

  To protect the space from being abused, shouldn't we delete, redirect and protect? Surely to keep it is to preserve the current abuse of the page? --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 13:53, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.