Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Deletion noticeboard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete, as the Civility noticeboard's debate grabbed most of the attention. Most of the comments there were saw these three noticeboards as a bad idea. Titoxd^{(?!? - help us)} 01:24, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Deletion noticeboard

For the same reasons as the Wikipedia:Civility noticeboard mfd. We shouldn't be forking dispute resolution processes. There's forum shopping issues and the group isn't stable enough for this to be effective. See the Civility noticeboard mfd link above for more discussion Rx StrangeLove 01:55, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

• And for the same reasons, I believe we should keep it with a {{rejected}} tag. Rossami (talk) 04:06, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - its not even been put into use yet. Ian13/talk 08:32, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

  And comment: "group isn't stable enough for this to be effective" - so deleting it will help will it? Ian13/talk 08:44, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Well, for someone who was the "chief executive" of the group that comment is a little snarky. That just adds to my feeling that the group isn't ready for something like this. I didn't suggest deletion of this page to help concordia but to get rid of a Deletion noticeboard that's a very bad idea. Rx StrangeLove 15:26, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as per traditional Confuscian belief that forks are violent. Bongout 10:05, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

First edit this week. (^'-')^ Covington 10:28, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

• Keep We finally get some work done and you go an nominate it for deletion. Why dont you give it a chance? It will work out - • The Giant Puffin • 10:09, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Please work out the issues on the Concordia talk page before labeling it as something to be deleted. (^'-')^ Covington 10:28, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete in practice it seems useless. Computerjoe's talk 10:37, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This duplicates existing pages, such as WP:ANI. Agree with nom as to the risk of forum shopping. Suggest that if Concordia really want this, they have it on their project to make clear that it is part of that project and not one of the usual noticeboards. --bainer (talk) 10:44, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete --pgk^(talk) 10:49, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep or merge with Wikipedia:Civility noticeboard. Misza13 ^{T C} 10:57, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. —Nightstallion (?) 11:03, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above.  Grue  11:33, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. It's unnecessary and extremely likely to be misused. If y'all really want to help out in keeping AfD clean, consider actually getting in there and helping out, setting a good example, leaving little notes on AfD subpages when someone's gone too far (e.g. screaming "cruft"), and being actually useful instead of taking part in a scary project and its offshoots. fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 12:14, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, forking and forum shopping. FreplySpang 13:49, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. If I understand Wikipedia:How to create policy correctly, this needs to be proposed, not just implemented. I also don't see what useful it adds. What JesseW and FreplySpang say in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Civility noticeboard also applies here. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 15:15, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Mark Gallagher. --Cyde↔Weys 17:41, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Move to a subpage of Wikipedia:Concordia, wrongly created as "THE" Deletion noticeboard, implying it as an offical WP wide policy.--Rayc 00:49, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, is it really necessary? --Terence Ong 04:17, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep, let's wait a bit longer and see what happens. ~Linuxerist E/L/T 11:34, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, move, reject or merge. The Land 18:51, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Ral315 (talk) 21:24, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete more "policing" by not-necessarily-qualified-but-we-write-our-names-down-on-this-page users. -- Drini 21:26, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete; unproductive as a solution to civility issues, forks existing processes, encourages needless bureaucracy. Christopher Parham (talk) 04:51, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.