Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Bus terminal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Coredesat 03:40, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Bus terminal

While it does have an historical tag on the page, it reads more like nonsense to me, doesn't explain what it did or anything, it's better of to delete it instead of leaving it historical Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 05:39, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete I see no relevance of this, if it kept actual relevant information about what it was such as Concordia did then it would be acceptable but it does seem like nonsense currently. Best Regards - Tellyaddict (Talk) 18:03, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
• Neutral seems to be a short-lived but interesting project, before I make up my mind I'd like to know why it was inactivated and when did that happen? Wooyi 21:23, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, I can see that there was some merit in the idea of "guided tours" of content areas but this is, in the end, what Wikiprojects and portals are for, so better to work on those, I think. Guy (Help!) 16:53, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
  • ...and we also have Wikipedia:Featured topics. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 18:42, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Although done in good faith, it seems a misunderstanding of Wikipedia's navigation process, attempting to replace something that categories, lists, and portals aid for. Given that it doesn't provide any meaningful context, I feel deletion would be a better solution here rather than tagging historical. Michaelas10 (Talk) 17:54, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete or Userfy if the original authors/contributors want. Good idea, but redundant in light of what we already have. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 18:42, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.