Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Ioannes Festusis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete all. Xoloz 16:17, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User talk:Ioannes Festusis etc.

This user claims to be an alternate account of Hephaestos (talk • contribs) (which is not an uncommon occurrance), but his upload log suggests otherwise, and his only non-image edit is what is shown on his talk page (sans the mfd tag). In addition, I think this user is likely the same user as Von_Van (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log), based on their upload logs. Scobell302 04:22, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

BTW, after investigating further, I have discovered more such pages (their contribution logs do not match that of the real Hephaestos):

• User talk:TenDollars
• User talk:Sotseahpeh
• User talk:Mrbelvedereposter46
• User talk:Mrbelvedereposter47
• User talk:213.171.219.245 (which, BTW, is an open proxy)
• User talk:Sozferka
• User talk:Michael the Californian
• User talk:John Farder
• User talk:ASDamic
• User talk:Pgk is a sockpuppet of Mrbelvedereposter
• User talk:Hepheustos
• User talk:Nufydubshinki

As such, I'm adding these pages to the discussion as well. Scobell302 04:30, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

• Comment - Would a checkuser request be appropriate here? MER-C 09:53, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - they are all indef blocked vandals. You may also want to add User talk:Nufydubshinki and list the category Category:Alternate Wikipedia accounts of Hephaestos for deletion too as it is entirely populated by these accounts. Yomangani^talk 10:07, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

  I've added the talk page; however, the category is a redlink, so it can't be "deleted" at this time. Scobell302 10:45, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

  Yeah, sorry (brain wasn't in gear) - it will be empty when these pages are deleted anyway. Yomangani^talk 10:48, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - As per above. Badbilltucker 19:05, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, I find all these pages claiming to be Hephaestos to be useful: they help us identify user accounts that need to be permablocked. --Deathphoenix ʕ 13:51, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Comment - (edit conflict) Did anybody (before me) tell Hephaestos about this? -- kenb215 talk 13:54, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • No, and I don't think it's necessary. I'm sure he's well aware that there are many accounts claiming to be him, and he's only semi-active now anyway. --Deathphoenix ʕ 15:46, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

• I know it isn't necessary, but I thought it was considered courteous to inform a user when something about them was happening on the wiki. I, personally, would like to know. Anyway,

• Delete per above -- kenb215 talk 16:59, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, probably Johnny the Vandal or the like. --Mr. Lefty (talk) 17:21, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.