Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Zuo Ci Cheat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deleted userpages and blocked users responsible as they have had absolutely no constructive edits to Wikipedia. I even found childish vandalism on several edits.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 01:49, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Zuo Ci Cheat

For some reason, these people think their userspace is for playing silly games. It is not. Also nominated is User:King Logo and User:Xv8M4g3r, all of whom have made no encyclopedic contributions. Only User:Zuo Ci Cheat is a contested prod, but I threw all of these together as they are part of the same walled garden. MER-C 10:12, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete all as per nom. John Carter 14:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete all per nom. — PSUMark2006 talk | contribs 15:27, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

• Suggest adding User:Logan shane gregory as well - appears to be part of the same network of "users." — PSUMark2006 talk | contribs 13:03, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete all per nom --James, La gloria è a dio 20:12, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete all finally. ArchStanton 09:53, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
• Why delete it, we are not causing any harm. This is just a page for me and my friends. It is just a page which I created as an experiment. The silly games are that people always edit my page. While most of this isn't a problem, some people put innapropiate comments. Which I always try to delete. Don't delete my page, It isn't like I am causing problems to wikipedia. If I have then I am sorry. 'King Logo'
  I would also like to say thatUser:Xv8M4g3r did provide encycyclopedic content but was eddited by an thoughtless schoolboy who messed the page up, despite my efforts to protect it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by King Logo (talk • contribs).

  See Wikipedia:User page and Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#It doesn't do any harm. —Doug Bell ^talk 11:29, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

  OK. I see. It will change. Give me some time. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by King Logo (talk • contribs).

  The problem is not just the content of the user page. There is also the issue that of your 81 edits besides this page, the only edits that weren't to your talk page or your schoolmate's talk pages were these: not useful, not useful, vandalism, vandalism, vandalism, and request for help with lost password. A user page is for contributors to the encyclopedia. You don't seem to fall into that group. —Doug Bell ^talk 12:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.