Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Son of a Peach/BlockUsername

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Xoloz 15:41, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:Son of a Peach/BlockUsername

Originally created as real template and nominated for deletion on TfD but userfied before any decision reached. This "template" has now been deployed against new users, some who would have been blocked anyway, but at least three where it was just WP:BITE. The creator appears to be trying to make a WP:POINT - and extending that point to this being part of "helping" Wikipedia prior to an RfA. With misuse, failing WP:AGF in some uses and the WP:POINT thing, I feel it needs to go. ➨ ЯEDVERS 18:20, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per Redvers and also my TfD nomination before it was userfied. Everything that was said on the TfD still applies. SoaP, next time, please do not move articles while they are being discussed on *fD; this is disruptive. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-08-15 20:56Z
• Delete. It was headed to the chopping block before it was userfied, the userfication was done only to avoid the deletion on a procedural matter? This sounds like a perfect case for WP:IAR. Titoxd^(?!?) 00:46, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and above. I'm not sure why she created it. --Bigtop 19:38, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.