Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Paulino

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete as abandoned user page for non-contributor. —Doug Bell ^talk 02:35, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Paulino

Not an actual editor's page: Only edits (15, all in September) are to this page (14) and talk page (1). PROD tag added, but removed by anon IP. Calton | Talk 15:16, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

• Keep temporarily Keep this for a few months, the user may return and to find his/her user page is missing could make them get the wrong end of the stick and think that wikipedia deletes pages for no reason.Tellyaddict^{Editor review!} 11:42, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

• He's had five months already to have started. So far, bupkis. --Calton | Talk 22:06, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - self-promotion by an inactive non-contributor. There's not much else to say. Gavia immer 18:34, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Please don't bite. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Abeg92 (talk • contribs) 14:38, 19 February 2007 (UTC).

• Five months is long past "newbie" and onto "not actually an editor". --Calton | Talk 22:06, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

• Weak delete - no edits here outside of own userspace. While I am hesitant about this, user behavior on the Spanish Wikipedia is not encouraging. w:es:Usuario:Paulino made 5 edits, 4 of which were rollbacked by an admin; in addition, another account was set up (w:es:Usuario:Paulino73), and the only edits made by this account were to the user page of the first account (?). Wikipedia is not a webspace provider. If this person comes back, I'll be glad to give them the source code of their user page that is currently on my hard drive. Gracenotes^T § 21:24, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

• Or just have an admin undelete it. --Calton | Talk 22:07, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

• Strong Keep The user, hopefully, will contribute in the future. There are very many userpages like this. There's no need to delete the page. ConDem^Talk 04:10, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

• The user, hopefully, will contribute in the future. Yes, and, hopefully, we'll all get free ponies, too: in other words, that's not a reason, that's wishful thinking.
• There are very many userpages like this. WP:INN, in a sense, applies here: that sort of excuse doesn't help when used on a cop handing out speeding tickets ("Other people are speeding, officer!" "Well, you're the one that I caught, sir"). Also, there are several hundred fewer since I started tagging these, some created as far back as 2004 and untouched since. --Calton | Talk 22:06, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.