Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mylittlehell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. WP:NOT, offered to restore if they want to try it in Main: space, but cautioned as to notbaility. — xaosflux ^Talk 15:00, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Mylittlehell

User's only contributions have been to this page which promotes a web forum. Wikipedia is not a web host. ¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 21:25, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

• Keep and redesign This is crap, but it can be rethought.--CJ King 00:06, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not a webhost and should not be used for promotional purposes, especially when a whole userpage is dedicated to it.
• Delete - Looks like an attempt to skirt notability requirements by creating an encyclopedia article in userspace. They should either demonstrate notability and be moved to mainspace, or more likely, be deleted per not a webhost. —Dgies^t c 21:39, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - misuse. `'mikka 07:44, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - per nom -- Korean alpha for knowledge (Talk / Contributions) 10:34, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete articles like this belong in wikispace, not userspace. It can go into a user subpage, but the author has to make sure it can meet WP:WEB. - RiseRobotRise 04:34, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
• Move to article space where it belongs. Then I hope it will be deleted with fire, or nuked from orbit (it's the only way to be sure!) --Gwern (contribs) 21:07 18 January 2007 (GMT)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.