Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:JPatrickBedell/JDSabow evidence 2007
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion | User:JPatrickBedell
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy delete as copyvio. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] User:JPatrickBedell/JDSabow evidence 2007
Original research, specifically Synthesis of published material to advance a position. Article creator's user page states: "am determined to see that justice is served in the death of Colonel James Sabow. I apologize for the graphic content of some of my contributions. I am very disturbed by the fact that Col. Sabow's civilian superiors and their successors have been able to continue their narco-mercantilism." — ERcheck (talk) 02:20, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. This is pretty much campaigning, which is bad. -Amark moo! 02:23, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Despite what the article says, it's not evidence that's usable, it's just opinion with nothing to back it up. I'm all for keeping everything that could be used to improve James E. Sabow if there were enough third party reliable references to support keeping that article, but upon reading this, there's nothing here that can help. Delete. - Taxman Talk 03:45, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - Copyright violation from this website [1], see the third link (Evidence summary.doc) which is this word document. [2] It is apparently authored by J. David Sabow, MD, Col Sabow's brother. — ERcheck (talk) 06:12, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete another part of this user's crusade that needs to be deleted. Consists of opinion and looks to be a copyvio--Looper5920 11:35, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
