Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Grlutz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Xoloz 17:02, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:Grlutz

User page contains previously speedied material regarding personal life, life's history and band. WP:NOT a free webhost. Delete.  RasputinAXP  c 03:08, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per Wikipedia is not a free webhost. --Coredesat 07:13, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Undecided. I'd ask the user to tone it down, but there is nothing here which fundamentally violates accepted user page standards other than perhaps the problem of using main-space infoboxes. Editors are allowed to talk about their hobbies. Just zis Guy you know? 11:45, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom, or move to geocities namespace. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 11:59, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I have seen other users do something along those lines and their pages have not been deleted. QuizQuick 15:17, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • We grant some latitude to good users who are making valuable contributions to the encyclopedia. Reviewing this user's contribution history, I find 1 Talk page comment, 5 deleted edits to a school's article, 1 example of vandalism, 1 unsourced comment about a baseball player and one creation of a misspelled and improperly capitalized redirect. Compare that to 115 edits to the user page. That does not seem to be a use in line with the intentions of WP:USER. Delete but I'll reconsider that opinion if the user begins making serious and substantive contributions to the project. Rossami (talk) 19:02, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete the thing that sold it was the names of girls he slept with. Far beyond WP:USER. -- Samir धर्म 22:12, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Complete violation of WP:USER. Even if the the user is a extensive contributor, WP:USER#What_can_I_not_have_on_my_user_page clearly states that this kind of nonsense isn't allowed. --Srikeit^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 01:08, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete The description of sexual encounters definitely violates WP:USER. Yanksox 12:19, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Rossami. Kusma (討論) 03:55, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.