Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:GeorgeMoney/UEW

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. — xaosflux ^Talk 13:30, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:GeorgeMoney/UEW

The page doesn't state it's aim. If anything, it should be deleted or merged to Wikipedia:United Users Computerjoe's talk 09:54, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Nice to newcommers this page, isn't it? "Hah! We are a part of an elite group of editors, and we can surround you!" Ian13/talk 13:32, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Fence - its a user subpage, no real harm -- Tawker 14:15, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Fence?!? Ian13/talk 16:27, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
    • En garde! --Rory096 20:35, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. ~Linuxerist A/C/E/L/P/S/T/Z 14:39, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Tawker. --Osbus 15:09, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Tawker. What does it help to delete it? How do you know it won't evovle into something else? --GeorgeMoney ^T·C 15:40, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Tawker. --Andy123 ^candy? 15:56, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Tawker. General Eisenhower • (at war or at peace) 15:56, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. This is userspace and no harm is been done. E Asterion ^{u talking to me?} 15:57, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• I agree that this does no specific harm, and don't advocate its deletion. However, it would be very very nice if people would stop creating these useless little clubs. They have no relevance to Wikipedia, and the little cliques certain users are attempting to create are anathema to this project. fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 16:10, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Seconded. This sort of half-hearted forming of endless unions & groups & organisations just makes everyone involved look silly. Go write an encyclopedia, people! Shimgray | talk | 16:39, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Between Computer Joe; Ian13; and Cyde you can't have any fun around here.--Gangsta-Easter-Bunny 16:24, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Is that a personal attack or just incivility? Computerjoe's talk 16:43, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
    • Oh, hush. Can't you see it's a cry for help from one unfairly oppressed beneath your jacbooted heel? For shame, Joe, for shame! As pennance I insist that you create at least five (5) particularly stupid and brightly-coloured userboxen, one (1) banner for the Wiki Campaign of your choice (do not choose a legitimate Wikiproject or well-loved body, like the Wiki Kindness Campaign or Elle MacPherson), three (3) never-to-be-used-again personal barnstars, and a Livejournal-esque "friends" list. fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 17:08, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
      • See, from that, leads me to wonder who sounds the most pathetic here... Ian13/talk 16:23, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Yep, we can't have fun can we? ESP try and get community spirit up, and they arn't exactly the most popular. Of cource, moaning that people are no fun doesn't really help anything, especially when people just get attacked for doing what they do. Skewed comes to mind. Ian13/talk 16:23, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Tawker Will (^E_@) T 16:38, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable anti-semitistic vanispamcruftisement which does not assist in building the encyclopedia. --Avillia ^{(Avillia me!)} 16:41, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Very funny. fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 17:21, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment - it is no longer the United Editors of WP. Now can you close this nom? --GeorgeMoney ^T·C 19:48, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

  So now it is an organisation without a name and purpose. The nom stays. Computerjoe's talk 19:49, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

  So that means you're gonna delete User:GeorgeMoney/Wikipedians too? Because the new version of this page is just like User:GeorgeMoney/Wikipedians. --GeorgeMoney ^T·C 19:52, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

  These pages are almost identical. Please consider merging them. Computerjoe's talk 19:57, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

  Look. Why couldn't you just leave me alone in the first place? --GeorgeMoney ^T·C 20:05, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

  I saw a page which I thought should have discussion regarding deletion, so I posted it here. it is/was nothing personal. Computerjoe's talk 20:08, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

  It's obviously going to be kept, so I am just going to revert my changes to it to the version you nominated it for deletion for. --GeorgeMoney ^T·C 20:11, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

• Keep per Tawker; it's in the userspace. joturner 21:37, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• It's a Keeper. Chuck^(척뉴넘) 08:03, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep definite precedent set with userpage cliques -- Samir धर्म 09:00, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, no worse than CVU or Esperanza. Christopher Parham (talk) 04:32, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Utterly pointless, in my opinion, but no different from all the other userspace clubs in this project. Rockpocket 06:47, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Christopher Parham. — Dan | talk 20:36, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
  • I laughed. --Rory096 20:51, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.