Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Geo.plrd/Phoenix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was a speedy deletion per CSD G4, with a healthy dose of WP:POINT. This goes against community consensus and Wikipedia protocols. Any vitriol can be directed toward me at my talk page. -- Merope 18:06, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Geo.plrd/Phoenix

Attempt to recreate Esperanza - possibly speedy deletion, in which case can be closed early. Also has subpages and a fledgling bureucracy. Carcharoth 17:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

The following subpages are also listed for deletion:

• User:Geo.plrd/Phoenix/Coordination
• User:Geo.plrd/Phoenix/Coffee Lounge
• User:Geo.plrd/Phoenix/member
• User:Geo.plrd/Phoenix/header
• User:Geo.plrd/Phoenix/header/Coordination
• User:Geo.plrd/Phoenix/phoenix

• Speedy Delete Recreation of deleted content perhaps? Just beat me to the nomination. --Spartaz 17:47, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, delete, delete. This is an attempt to skirt community consensus, which is abundantly clear following Esparanza's MfD. —bbatsell ¿? 17:48, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
• I'd contend it's speediable. Not explicitly in WP:CSD, but quite obviously a flagrant breach of consensus reached at the Esperanza MFD, which is what this new MFD will probably turn into. – Chacor 17:49, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
• I think this comes under speedy delete. I think the intense irony of the only elements of Phoenix so far being the self-appointed "co-ordinators" (no normal members mind you) and a Coffee Lounge is not lost on anyone. Can we not mark historical this time? :) Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 17:51, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Speedy or otherwise. Perhaps letting this MfD run its course would be useful for setting a precedent for speedy deletion of future Esperanza recreations. SuperMachine 17:52, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - not again. Please, no. Esperanza does not deserve to rise from the ashes. But it does deserve to die a natural death, with dignity. Please let that happen. And what's up with everyone's addiction to "Governance", anyway? Moreschi ^Deletion! 17:56, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - the talk page has this comment: "Before this gets deleted, you should probably move your effort to WikiSocial." - please can anyone wanting to run an Esperanza-style bureaucracy please consider going over there? Also, I haven't managed to list the subpages yet. Can someone else do that? Thanks. I agree with Dev920 - too new to need preservation of the history (can't believe I said delete history...) Carcharoth 17:57, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

• Done. -- Merope 18:02, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. I'm very much inclined to speedy it: I don't think we need another huge MfD discussion about it. It's done, it's over, let's deal with it and get back to creating an encyclopedia. -- Merope 18:02, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.